MarshallFin1
☠️ Banned ☠️
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2010
- Messages
- 3,717
- Reaction score
- 13
Its otas people. Relax. Im sure philbin is saving tannenhill for actual training camp. The real battle is in training camp, this crap here is smokescreen.
Me neither...a healty Garrard is >>>> than Moore. That said, either way I don't want to see Tanny in the starting lineup unless its a blowout game. I think the fact that he has a probowl QB in Garrard ahead of him, and a not so bad QB in Matt Moore ahead of him says that the team will bring him along slowly hopefully.
Its otas people. Relax. Im sure philbin is saving tannenhill for actual training camp. The real battle is in training camp, this crap here is smokescreen.
its otas people. Relax. Im sure philbin is saving tannenhill for actual training camp. The real battle is in training camp, this crap here is smokescreen.
Wasn't Garrard the the guy with a very low amount of interceptions? Trying to remember...
Yes, only 54 picks in 76 games started and a 2.4 Int percentage.
By comparison Tom Brady has 115 picks in 159 games started and a 2.2 Int percentage.
Not saying Garrard is Brady but he is smart with throwing to the right place.
He also doesn't throw a lot of TD's. In his 5 years as a starter he had 10, 18, 15, 15, and 23 TD's he only started all 16 games twice
Ive been saying it all off season, moore sucks and the only way garrad doesn't beat him out is if he's hurt. Now I'll be disappointed if Tannehill doesn't beat them out because of how high a pick we used on him. That kind of investment should be better than a career back up in moore right out of the gate but garrad I'd be a little more comfortable starting in front of tannehill.
actually, i'd say more and more people are coming around to the thought of him starting.I may be in the minority here, but I believe Garrard will be the starter come week 1 barring injury. We shall see...