F
finswin56
To add to that, BCS conferences must do something to balance out the extra top ranked games that the SEC, ACC, and BIG-12 teams face with a conference championship. It's absurd that this game can have such a large effect on those conferences with the other BCS conferences don't do something similar. And don't get me started about the Big-10 schools not even played each team in conference.MikeO said:The ONLY answer is this. The ONLY way you can play for the national title is IF you win your conference.
So, that means the year Oklahoma lost the Big 12 title game they shouldn't have played for it all. That means this year the loser of OhioSt/Mich gets no rematch.
If the BCS did that........pretty much all debates would be over. Now, how the conference decides their conference champ is up to them. Some conferences have a title game some don't. But that is up to the conference in the end. So, for example that would mean this year you end up with.....Mich,L'ville,BC,Florida,Texas,Cal. ND get's screwed on this but hey, they can't have their cake and eat it too.
That is 6 schools. Hopefully out of 6 you can figure out the best 2. If not, then you leave the door open to a +1 game. Doesn't mean it will take place every year. But say for this year. You have Florida-Mich in one bowl. And then L'ville-Texas in the other. And Florida wins and you still have L'ville unbeaten. Then do a +1 game a few weeks later.
But say L'ville loses at some point, then the Florida-Mich winner is the champ. No +1 game necessary.
THAT is the answer!!!!! Just have that 1 game in your back-pocket at all times.