Building a Program and a Coach's Conflict of Interest | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Building a Program and a Coach's Conflict of Interest

Austin Tatious

Starter
Club Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2004
Messages
7,872
Reaction score
8,087
When Danny was headed toward the twilight of his career, the Dolphin franchise was faced with going for broke and trying to get a title before he retired. The 1995 team, for example, had 17 former first round picks, many of whom brought baggage, drug problems, and/or bad chemistry (think Eric Green and Steve Emtman inter alia).

That approach did not work, and led to the one glimmer of hope this franchise has had in the last dozen years, i.e., the early years of Jimmy Johnson. Jimmy did a great job building the defense with stellar picks like Surtain, Madison, Thomas, and Taylor, who have something like 20 pro bowls between them. Jimmy was less successful on offense with ignominous picks like Larry Shannon, John Avery, JJ Johnson, Rob Konrad, and Yatil Green. He also traded out of a spot where he could have gotten Randy Moss. But Jimmy at least tried to build a program.

We need to return to the "building a program" mentality. The quick fix approach that Wannstedt and Saban have employed have been utterly disastrous. This is how you blow entire drafts like 2003 and 2006 (with the exceptions of Bell and possibly Frederic Evans and Rod Wright). Derek Hagan cannot play. Sources within the organization have told Joe Rose that Jason Allen does not have the "necessities" to play safety and probably doesn't have the hips to play corner which would be his only chance.

When the coach calls the shots on personnel, you have a conflict of interest. He is worried about the here and now and not building a program. When the coach lacks intellectual horsepower, then you end up with Jamar Fletcher over Drew Brees when you desperately need a young qb. This is not Monday Morning quarterbacking. Many of us with half a brain understood that Brees was an obvious pick for us, and then to take a corner when you have Surtain and Madison already defies imagination at a shocking level.

Bottom line: I am less concerned with the coach. We need a GM who is savvy and recognizes talent. Someone who will make the right picks for the organization overall not someone trying to achieve immediate gratification. The Colts, Ravens, Pats and other front line organizations have such a structure. They have drafted well and are big winners. In the 1970's Miami had such people like George Young and Bobby Beathard. We need to get to that.

So, let's hope Randy Mueller understands this and can build a "program."

As for a Coach, the x's and o's fall heavily on a coordinator. We need a leader who can inspire and who has an overriding big picture approach and intelligence. For all the dorky armchair quarterbacks here, we are not involved in the interviews. No one here really can understand these issues without participating in the interviews. Personally I am not really impressed with the pool of candidates, but right now acquiring personnel is far more important. But that said, it is utterly absurd when dorks on here mock Cam Cameron's record at Indiana. Indiana is an impossible situation to win in. I am not sure he is the right guy, but then again, Gailey and Michael Shula are not exactly inspiring either. Mora is fiery but doesn't seem very smart. So, they all have concerns. Let's hope the interview process leads to the right guy and none of us are involved in that process so we simply do not know enough to make the judgment.

History will bear out whether it ends up correct, not what some dorks on here say.
 
When Danny was headed toward the twilight of his career, the Dolphin franchise was faced with going for broke and trying to get a title before he retired. The 1995 team, for example, had 17 former first round picks, many of whom brought baggage, drug problems, and/or bad chemistry (think Eric Green and Steve Emtman inter alia).

That approach did not work, and led to the one glimmer of hope this franchise has had in the last dozen years, i.e., the early years of Jimmy Johnson. Jimmy did a great job building the defense with stellar picks like Surtain, Madison, Thomas, and Taylor, who have something like 20 pro bowls between them. Jimmy was less successful on offense with ignominous picks like Larry Shannon, trading out of a spot where he could have gotten Randy Moss, John Avery, JJ Johnson, Rob Konrad, and Yatil Green. But Jimmy at least tried to build a program.

We need to return to the "building a program" mentality. The quick fix approach that Wannstedt and Saban have employed have been utterly disastrous. This is how you blow entire drafts like 2003 and 2006 (with the exceptions of Bell and possibly Frederic Evans and Rod Wright). Derek Hagan cannot play. Sources within the organization have told Joe Rose that Jason Allen does not have the "necessities" to play safety and probably doesn't have the hips to play corner which would be his only chance.

When the coach calls the shots on personnel, you have a conflict of interest. He is worried about the here and now and not building a program. When the coach lacks intellectual horsepower, and you end up with Jamar Fletcher over Drew Brees when you desperately need a young qb. This is not Monday Morning quarterbacking. Many of us with half a brain understood that Brees was an obvious pick for us, and then to take a corner when you have Surtain and Madison already defies imagination at a shocking level.

Bottom line: I am less concerned with the coach. We need a GM who is savvy and recognizes talent. Someone who will make the right picks for the organization overall not someone trying to have immediate gratification. The Colts, Ravens, Pats and other front line organizations have such a structure. They have drafted well and are big winners. In the 1970's Miami had such people like George Young and Bobby Beathard. We need to get to that.

So, let's hope Randy Mueller understands this and can build a "program."

As for a Coach, the x's and o's fall heavily on a coordinator. We need a leader who can inspire and who has an overriding big picture approach and intelligence. For all the dorky armchar quarterbacks here, we are not involved in the interviews. No one here really can understand these issues without participating in the interviews. Personally I am not really impressed with the pool of candidates, but right now acquiring personnel is far more important. But that said, it is utterly absurd when dorks on here mock Cam Cameron's record at Indiana. Indiana is an impossible situation to win in. I am not sure he is the right guy, but then again, Gailey and Michael Shula are not exactly inspiring either. Mora is fiery but doesn't seem very smart. So, they all have concerns. Let's hope the intreview process leads to the right guy and none of us are involved in that process so we simply do not know enough to make the judgment.

History will bear out whether it ends up correct, not what some dorks on here say.

WOW!! A rookie wr that someone says cannot play?
 
Dropping the football has nothing to do with being a rookie. It is an adventure every time the ball is thrown to Hagan.

Most rookies struggle because they cannot get open, run wrong routes, have trouble with the jam etc.

Hagan cannot catch the football and that is not a rookie problem, it is a competence problem.
 
Dropping the football has nothing to do with being a rookie. Its an adveture everytime the ball is thrown to Hagan.

I agree with you about dropping the football but to make a statement that he cannot play, is rather premature.
 
With Cameron supposedly in the lead, his record at Indiana is a legitimate concern. It's not just mocking.

No situation is impossible to win in. The great coaches have won with teams they weren't supposed to win with because the necessity bread the evolution of ideas. Beyond that, they were fundamentally sound coaches who made sure the little things and the basics were done right. Consider that Walsh developed the WCO because he lost a rookie phenom and had to replace him with a weak-armed, but quick thinking QB. Belichick took a Pats squad that had no biz being in the playoffs and had them execute simple concepts to take down a vastly superior juggernaut. Urban Meyer developed the spread option while he was at smaller schools because he didn't have the talent to compete head to head. So saying that Cameron was bad because he was at Indiana is an excuse, not a reason.

More importantly, were there extenuating circumstances for his failure at Indiana? For example, Belichick flopped in Cleveland because the organization was unstable. But he learned from that experience and found himself a better franchise. Most importantly, he corrected his previous mistakes at the next stop. Is there any evidence that Cameron knows why he failed and how to fix it? Gregg Williams supposedly has a file on his mistakes and a plan for what he will do differently the next time. Does this exist for Cameron?

The big concern with Cameron is that he comes from a long line of great offensive minds, but mediocre head coaches. That Norv Turner, Mike Martz, Al Saunders school is not exactly known for their head coaching accumen. That seems unfortunately borne out by Cameron's Indiana tenure.
 
Excellent post rocket and fair point. Frankly, you may be right. But I am not sure his record at Indiana disqualifies him either for some of these reasons:

1. The last time IU won the Big Ten was 1968.

2. IU has the worst all time record in the Big Ten.

3. Indiana is a small state with only 5-6 million people, and yet it shares the state with Notre Dame and Purdue. There simply is not enough talent for IU. Statistically there are not enough bodies to go around.

4. Indiana does not even produce that many good players even relative to its population. It is a basketball crazy state. Kids turn into basketball players readily and there just isn't the focus on football. It's like the fact that the United States does not produce many soccer players; its because the talented athletes are playing other sports.

5. There is minimal fan interest in IU football. The stadium only holds 50,000 seats and the school normally draws on the order of 25k to 30k fans unless the opposing team brings fans such as the case with Ohio State.

6. Indiana plays in the very deep Big Ten, where they have to deal with OSU, UM, Wisconsin, Penn State and Iowa. Not very many cupcakes there. Urban Meyer is a terrific coach but you cannot win with second tier talent in the Big Ten.

7. The bottom line is that, at Indiana, Cameron was forced to play with kids who Michigan, Ohio State, and Notre Dame didn't want, or with 3rd tier kids from Florida. You cannot realistically expect to beat teams where the last kid on their roster was more highly recruited than all but 4-5 of your players. That is exactly the situation that Indiana has been in relative to Michigan, Notre Dame, and Ohio State.

8. The NFL is different than college. All teams are on equal footing for the OPPORTUNITY to obtain talent. That was not the case for Cameron at Indiana.

9. I am not sure Cameron is the right guy. But, he has been around coaching his whole life (his father was a college coach), and he has done well as both a quarterback's coach and an offensive coordinator. I am not sure Cameron is all that, but I would not dismiss him because he couldn't win in an impossible situation at his ALMA MATER, Indiana. He understands offensive balance and is innovative offensively. If he interviewed well, he might be ok.
 
Back
Top Bottom