ckparrothead
Premium Member
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...ill-be-better-off-without-cb-richard-marshall
Felt I had to weigh in on the topic.
Felt I had to weigh in on the topic.
They made Marshall a starter, demoting Vontae Davis initially to nickel corner and eventually trading him off the roster. This made Richard Marshall primarily a perimeter corner on base downs, occasionally moving inside in nickel packages.
The results were predictably less than spectacular. According to Pro Football Focus, Marshall spent 145 snaps in coverage, allowing 14 of 23 passes to be completed on him for a total of 207 yards, two touchdowns and one interception.
Additionally, Marshall accumulated four penalties, though one was waived by the opposing team. Two of the penalties came in the end zone, which resulted in the opposing offense starting with a 1st-and-goal from the one-yard line.
It would not be terribly inaccurate to say he was responsible for allowing four touchdowns in only four games.
The details only supported my initial conclusions on Marshall's strengths and weaknesses. Using data from Pro Football Focus, we can determine that he played 48 snaps from the slot, allowing only three completions for 28 yards on those snaps. On the boundary, he allowed 11 catches for 179 yards on the remaining 97 snaps.
That means he allowed slightly less than 0.6 yards per coverage snap from the slot, and over 1.8 yards per coverage snap from the boundary.