All these playoff defenses with mutiple fronts . . . tsk tsk Miami.
Green Bay/Dallas
- Thread starter BahamaFinFan78
- Start date
I haven't paid much attention to Dallas. How's that defense. I was under the impression it was a weak spot
Chose Green Bay to win. They're the Pats of the NFC. Rodgers can't be stopped like Brady.
BahamaFinFan78
Active Roster
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2010
- Messages
- 7,558
- Reaction score
- 7,713
Rodgers doesn't even need his chin strap.
Rodgers > Brady just wasn't gifted the same kind of coaching staff
They are the lone standard 4-3 left in the playoffs and Rodgers is picking it apart with ease.
They've played well but also greatly benefit from thier offenses TOP.
Seattle is the best 4-3 around but they have some special talent
BahamaFinFan78
Active Roster
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2010
- Messages
- 7,558
- Reaction score
- 7,713
Are they taking Elliot out of the game?
4-3 Under which Seattle runs is very different from the standard 4-3 Over that the Cowboys use as well as us. The 4-3 Under is closer to a 3-4.
Atlanta also runs the 4-3 Under and thier defense virtually mirrors Seattle's.
What do the Bengals run? Cuz I think that's basically our model with all these ex Bengals
Yep. 4-3 Over.
BahamaFinFan78
Active Roster
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2010
- Messages
- 7,558
- Reaction score
- 7,713
Are these refs not looking at Claiborne? That's twice now.
Bear with me bc I'm not an Xs and Os guy. Didn't the Bengals used to have a top 10 defense? Was that the same scheme? I think its only been a couple years
Yes, they did. Also have to take into consideration the quality of thier division at that time.
Not to mention they've never had success in the playoffs. You can point to a couple of things (coaching, QBing) but lack of versatility in the 4-3 Over is also one of them.