CorduroyG
Rookie
And the team this competitive (4-4 with three 3 point losses), would they still make the marshall trade? I dont see how they could.
Sent from my SCH-R720 using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my SCH-R720 using Tapatalk 2
tannehill would be this good
Yes. It wasn't about talent. It was about team chemistry, it was about locker room chemistry, it was about Philbin establishing himself as leader and coach of the team without personalities trying to undermine what he was trying to do.
The real question you should ask is if Marshall had stayed would Tannehill still be this good? Marshall would have been telling Tannehill to get him the ball, the rest of the passing offense would have suffered and the way Marshall was throwing everyone under the bus you have to wonder if players would have bought into Philbin's philosophy as early as they did. You can even argue that Tannehill would have thrown more INTs since Marshall would free lance on his routes at times.
Yeahn
Philbin didn' want him.