I agree with those who have said that the officiating has been horrible in this series - on both sides.
But then, I have a problem with the officiating in the NBA in general; why is it that subjective offiating is accepted so readily?
You often hear that a player is a rookie, therefore "won't get the calls." You have an official walk up to Riley in the '03 season and say that he's glad to see Riley struggling for once.
Look no further than the way Shaq is officiated: He really, literally gets hit on the arms three and four times every time he has the ball, and usually no call. And the reason I hear is that it's because he's so big...or because he's Shaq.
So, because a player is exceptional and can dominate at will, it's the ref's job to neutralize him a bit? What kind of horsesh!t is THAT?
Can you envision a ref in football ever refereeing a prticular player differently? Calling Randy Moss's catches tighter, not giving him the close sideline calls because he's too good, and the ref feels he has to neutralize him a bit?
Holy **** man, someone explain this happy mierda to me, please!