FinsNYanksFan13 said:A National Championship is a sham LMAO. Get a clue! How was it more difficult to win back then? Back then you knew definitivly who the best teams in the country were (there was usually 4 to 8). Nowadays their is 4 to 8 teams per conference that have a shot to win the National Championship and 20 times more schools competiting for players. That's why their is no more dynasty's like UCLA's, it's harder to win nowadays with the amount of schools and competition!
As far as players leaving, that's a bunch of crap right there. Your going with a bunch of assumptions and what if's. Your assuming if those players stayed UNC would have won more titles. You don't know they would have won. They might have but they also might not have, it's a two way street!
Coach K and Duke.....3 National Titles
Dean Smith.....2 National Titles!
You can cut that anyway you want but the numbers don't lie, Coach K has more National Titles then Dean and that's just how it is!
It was more difficult to win b/c you had to win your conference to make the NCAAs.
The '01 title was a sham b/c duke ws given that title. usually duke gets the officials in their pocket in ACC play but that year it happened in the Tourney. That FF was a complete sham.
So you don't think McAdoo, Worthy, jordan, Reid, Stackhouse, wallace could have helepd Dean to win another title?
DolphinDevil28 said:L S U
Now that duke is not a legit title contender and LSU it it will be all LSU we hear from you instead of talking about duke?