Rishard Matthews

Discussion in 'Miami Dolphins Forum' started by uk_dolfan, May 29, 2013.

  1. uk_dolfan

    uk_dolfan Founder of the FH Adam Gase fan club Moderator Finheaven VIP

    Joined:
    Sep 2012
    Messages:
    17,919
    Likes Received:
    1,936
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Omar Kelly@OmarKellynow
    Dolphins top performers 1. WR Rishard Matthews (3 TDs). 2. Safety Kelcie McCray (Int, big goal line breakup). 3. Koa Misi (pick 6)

    I have read a lot of good tweets about this kid so far in the OTA's im aware this means little but he also flashed some ability in games and pre season last year as well. Gibson, Wallace and Hartline should all be productive next year, it will be a massive improvement upon last year if we can also get some production out of others like Binns or Mathews.

    Ive a good feeling about this kid.

    A few other mentions of him today:

    Omar Kelly@OmarKellynow
    Nice score by Rishard Matthews on a diving catch on a pass from Ryan Tannehill.



    James Walker@JamesWalkerESPNnow
    #Dolphin WR Rishard Matthews makes two nice catches in the end zone from QB Ryan Tannehill.


    Barry Jackson@flasportsbuzznow
    Rishard matthews looked good. Tannehill threw int to misi which would have been returned for td if play continued


     
  2. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 2002
    Messages:
    48,929
    Likes Received:
    506
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Looking forward to his inevitably leapfrogging Brandon Gibson on the depth chart.
     
  3. NBP81

    NBP81 Yippi ka yay mother******! Donator

    Joined:
    Jan 2008
    Messages:
    5,720
    Likes Received:
    133
    Trophy Points:
    63
    If so, wouldn't Gibson be a subpar option as a no.4?
     
  4. KTOWNFINFAN

    KTOWNFINFAN Seasoned Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 2005
    Messages:
    6,557
    Likes Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I love hearing RT threw at least 2 TDs. He really struggled down in the redzone last year. Now that we have more weapons around him it is important that we start seeing more production from his arm down close to the endzone. The better we are at passing down there, the more it will open up the running game down there. Good to hear
     
  5. D0lphan72

    D0lphan72 War... War never changes Finheaven VIP Donator

    Joined:
    Dec 2009
    Messages:
    3,519
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    48
    yes
     
  6. uk_dolfan

    uk_dolfan Founder of the FH Adam Gase fan club Moderator Finheaven VIP

    Joined:
    Sep 2012
    Messages:
    17,919
    Likes Received:
    1,936
    Trophy Points:
    113
    People need to lay off on Gibson and give him a fair shot, the guy scored 5 tds last year, more than all our recievers combined, if he has another productive season like that this year nobody will be complaining.
     
  7. mega-fin-love

    mega-fin-love Just trust me Donator

    Joined:
    May 2010
    Messages:
    2,182
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    38
    agreed. Let's see what he can do for us
     
  8. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 2002
    Messages:
    48,929
    Likes Received:
    506
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think he's about right as a #4. I wouldn't call him ideal there. If you think about the Packers' receiver situation where they had Jennings, Nelson, Cobb and James Jones, whichever guy was the #4...that's pretty ideal. Gibson is not that. But I'd say Gibson is a #4. But that position is usually reserved for a young player that may still develop into a #1, #2 or #3...hence the aforementioned Cobb was at one point the #4 in Green Bay. Gibson is getting right at the point of being considered too long in the tooth to believe he's going to continue evolving...so teams could shy away from him being a #4.
     
  9. TheWalrus

    TheWalrus 1/7/14 Finheaven VIP

    Joined:
    Dec 2011
    Messages:
    19,849
    Likes Received:
    1,449
    Trophy Points:
    113
    At minimum. I think he's got a good shot at replacing Hartline at some point this year, too.
     
  10. Pat-London

    Pat-London A True Fan

    Joined:
    Aug 2009
    Messages:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    CK makes an interesting point re a potential leap of Matthews over Gibson and one that I agree with.

    Extending from this though... if Tyms and Binns or anyone else steps to the fore, I wouldn't be surprised to see Gibson be up for a trade bait discussion... considering you would then have, taking CK's suggestion; Wallace, Hartline, Matthews then the question would arise of why would you pay Gibson what you're paying him to be the 4th WR.

    This 3 through 6 spot WR discussion is going to be fascinating to watch. I just hope that Binns doesn't turn into a legawho situation?
     
  11. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 2002
    Messages:
    48,929
    Likes Received:
    506
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So does that mean some more people are starting to see why I questioned the wisdom of handing Brandon Gibson $3 million of signing bonus?
     
  12. HarryBagpipe

    HarryBagpipe Archibald Meatpants Super Donator Donator

    Joined:
    Apr 2007
    Messages:
    6,727
    Likes Received:
    99
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Didnt understand it from the beginning either. The guy isn't a slot and we paid big $$$ to hartline and Wallace who will be our outside receivers. This past draft was wr rich and we neglected it. Personally, I wouldn't be surprised to see chad bumphis out perform Gibson in the slot from the get go. I see all the money we are giving hartline, Gibson, Patterson and Marshall and I can't keep wondering why that couldn't be worked to get Jennings. Wallace and Jennings on the outside supplemented with bailey, bess, Matthews and/or swope seems real nice to me
     
  13. Pat-London

    Pat-London A True Fan

    Joined:
    Aug 2009
    Messages:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Not 'starting' to see... I was always curious about the signing in as far as development, but I always considering it a 'system upgrade' over Bess.

    I viewed it as a safe move to deepen the WR corps with some Vet presence, due to not knowing what would come from the draft and other undrafted FA's.

    What I do like, and taking your GB analogy... is that the 4th spot is for a youngster who has athletic ability to a level where they want to take a shot. Additionally, I would not be surprised at them giving strong consideration to carrying 6 WR's. A lot depends on this potentially interesting development at FB. I'd much prefer going the route of H/Back / TE combos than pure FB's.

    If you're right and Gibson starts sliding [and again, it's early days], then I think that speaks to not only Matthew's development but the others.
     
  14. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 2002
    Messages:
    48,929
    Likes Received:
    506
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Only if they get into the games and actually perform well.
     
  15. Pat-London

    Pat-London A True Fan

    Joined:
    Aug 2009
    Messages:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Always have to produce to stick around!
     
  16. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 2002
    Messages:
    48,929
    Likes Received:
    506
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well what I mean is let's say your former 7th round pick DOES beat the guy to whom you just gave $3.3 million a year. Yes it's a positive for your 7th round pick, but it's also a negative for the guy to whom you gave a $9.8 million contract ($3 million of which is guaranteed). The only way to tell if you did more positive than negative is if the guy that ends up playing is actually any good.
     
  17. finomenal

    finomenal A True Fan

    Joined:
    Jan 2009
    Messages:
    6,638
    Likes Received:
    702
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That was my thinking all along also. You don't sign a guy who projects to be your #4 WR when he has limited upside even if your WR group is stacked. Contracts expire and guys will want a big contract. It always helps to have a young ascending player to give you leverage.
     
  18. Wildbill3

    Wildbill3 Misery Loves Company Administrator Finheaven VIP Donator

    Joined:
    Dec 2001
    Messages:
    28,429
    Likes Received:
    418
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Regardless of that situation, (a 7th guy beating out a modestly paid FA WR) I think it was prudent by Ireland not to pin any of his hopes on any of our young WRs stepping it up and contributing. This is a direct reaction to the score of bodies we had in camp and later brought in and none of them really amounted to anything.
     
  19. FanMarino

    FanMarino HOF Pass Master

    Joined:
    Aug 2004
    Messages:
    4,972
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    This is still off season training with no pads yes? Just saying ;-)
     
  20. allsilverdreams

    allsilverdreams Starter Finheaven VIP Donator

    Joined:
    Apr 2007
    Messages:
    3,091
    Likes Received:
    49
    Trophy Points:
    48
    we shall see who is up for the task.i don't care what the persons last name is just as long as he puts his best on the field n wins the #3 or #4 spot
     
  21. Valandui

    Valandui Lumberjack Batman Donator

    Joined:
    May 2008
    Messages:
    10,233
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That says more about our WRs last year than Gibson.
     
  22. HarryBagpipe

    HarryBagpipe Archibald Meatpants Super Donator Donator

    Joined:
    Apr 2007
    Messages:
    6,727
    Likes Received:
    99
    Trophy Points:
    48
    True. Yet I've heard that this is the greatest phins offseason evaaaaa. On numerous occasions
     
  23. Lee2000

    Lee2000 FinHeaven VIP

    Joined:
    May 2002
    Messages:
    2,770
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think it is a little early to be talking about Gibson as a bust. Or in a lower spot at wr. I like Matthews a lot, but let us all take a breath and see what develops on the field. I also like what I am hearing about the younger wr talent. Different kind of talk than last year when everyone kept asking where the new receivers were, or getting on the 7-11 kick. I believe there is infintely better talent on the field at that position this year, and I would go as far as to say the same about the corners as well.
     
  24. CANDolphan

    CANDolphan Seasoned Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 2006
    Messages:
    3,107
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    38
    They toss out Bess, our 1st down specialist, in order to sign Gibson, another 1st down specialist.

    Bess was earning 2.5 million this year and was a FA. Gibson is getting 3 million a year for 3 years and has 3 million of his deal guaranteed. Now, I wasn't a fan of the Gibson signing when it happened, but now that we are sans Bess, I'm not against it.

    Question is... is Gibson equal to Bess in 1st downs? Does Gibson bring more to the table than Bess on the outside? Can Gibson match Bess's ability in the slot?

    I'm assuming Gibson is the replacement for Bess otherwise I just dont know
     
  25. Digital

    Digital Starter

    Joined:
    Feb 2008
    Messages:
    5,330
    Likes Received:
    805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Matthews is one of several reasons why I couldn't get behind the Brandon Gibson acquisition. I hope he proves me wrong, but I see more burst, power and determination in Matthews, not to mention speed. Of all the current dolphins WR's, Matthews strikes me as the one who most resbles a Green Bay receiver stylistically.
     
  26. Digital

    Digital Starter

    Joined:
    Feb 2008
    Messages:
    5,330
    Likes Received:
    805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well apparently, the one major piece holding 7-11 back was that he couldn't beat press coverage. He had then quickness and speed, but he couldn't get into his routes and was eliminated vs. Press coverage. Seeing as he profiled primarily as a slot guy, that's a huge deal. On Hard Knocks and at the open practices, this wasn't really shown. But, the coaches knew it. Since we don't really play press on defense, it wasn't highlighted in those public practices.

    In the preseason games, like Dallas, he was given a litmus test and did not pass it with flying colors. Personally, I wouldn't be surprised to see him pip up somewhere in the next couple of years if he can improve that. The kid has some ability to separate, and that's the most important trait a WR can have to make a roster.
     
  27. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 2002
    Messages:
    48,929
    Likes Received:
    506
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gibson thus far is being used as the replacement for Bess, that's correct. But I think Rishard Matthews will eventually leapfrog him. And I don't think Gibson is going to show any special gift for Bess' role. I think he'll be worse than Bess possibly by a margin.
     
  28. KTDolphins

    KTDolphins You have made me angry very angry indeed

    Joined:
    Sep 2009
    Messages:
    1,200
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Really, I don't hear about Wallace tearing it up either. Give these guys time to learn the system, some are so quick to write people off.
     
  29. Valandui

    Valandui Lumberjack Batman Donator

    Joined:
    May 2008
    Messages:
    10,233
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That and the fact that our WR coach couldn't stand him for some reason.
     
  30. Wildcat322

    Wildcat322 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2011
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The people who compare our receiving core to the Packers are crazy. If we switched receivers, the Packers would be much better off. Nelson, jones, and Cob have had Aaron Rogers for over one year. Let our guys develop before we destroy Gibson and compare us to the packers.
     
  31. Dr. Phin

    Dr. Phin Scout Team

    Joined:
    Aug 2008
    Messages:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I want someone to leapfrog Hartline. I don't think we have a real receiving corps until that happens.
     
  32. uk_dolfan

    uk_dolfan Founder of the FH Adam Gase fan club Moderator Finheaven VIP

    Joined:
    Sep 2012
    Messages:
    17,919
    Likes Received:
    1,936
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Some forum members may not like Gibson but the staff and GM clearly do.
     
  33. Dr. Phin

    Dr. Phin Scout Team

    Joined:
    Aug 2008
    Messages:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gibson caught my eye last year with the Rams...so, I'm going to cast him aside by any means. What I am concerned with is they may be trying to fit him as a "square peg into a round hole" as a slot...
     
  34. Valandui

    Valandui Lumberjack Batman Donator

    Joined:
    May 2008
    Messages:
    10,233
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Umm... no.
     
  35. uk_dolfan

    uk_dolfan Founder of the FH Adam Gase fan club Moderator Finheaven VIP

    Joined:
    Sep 2012
    Messages:
    17,919
    Likes Received:
    1,936
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Im not a fan of putting him in the slot either.
     
  36. Shouright

    Shouright Banned Hammered

    Joined:
    May 2004
    Messages:
    15,064
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Lots of folks wanted the team to draft someone to replace Davone Bess, without realizing that replacement was already on the roster.
     
  37. mbhcu98

    mbhcu98 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2013
    Messages:
    563
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    18
    No.
     
  38. Shouright

    Shouright Banned Hammered

    Joined:
    May 2004
    Messages:
    15,064
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I think you have to hedge your bets on Matthews's development. I don't think you can go into the crucial year of your franchise QB's development banking on the idea that Rishard Matthews will buck the odds of the typical 7th-round pick and become a reliable and productive target. If he does, then you still have depth in Gibson for a relatively cheap cost. It's not like we signed him to Mike Wallace money.
     
  39. Glaxocon

    Glaxocon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2013
    Messages:
    162
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gibson thus far is being used as the replacement for Bess, that's correct. But I think Rishard Matthews will eventually leapfrog him (In another year he may leapfrog Hartline IMO). I think Gibson will be better than Bess possibly by a margin or 2 or 3. Bess was not good at all sorry.
     
  40. mbhcu98

    mbhcu98 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2013
    Messages:
    563
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    18
    So, you'd rather him not do well? If he scores 5 TDs in our slot position, he will be an excellent signing for us.

    ---------- Post added at 07:38 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:37 PM ----------

    It is the best. Still offseason though.
     

Share This Page