Scheme Question | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Scheme Question

miamirw

Pro Bowler
Joined
Mar 15, 2004
Messages
2,663
Reaction score
268
I read that against the Chargers, we played mostly zone and very little man press. It's my understanding that both of our starters - Howard and Maxwell - are much better press corners than zone corners. My question: Did the absence of Timmons force us out of man press and into that loose zone? It seems to me, against a future HOF QB like Rivers, we would want to play man. However maybe against really good QBs it's best to play loose zone so that you don't give up the big play.
 
I saw quite a bit of both, but I won't know the exact type of coverages and the number of man & zone we played until the All22 is out. I'll post it here when I can. Should be out today sometime.
 
I saw quite a bit of both, but I won't know the exact type of coverages and the number of man & zone we played until the All22 is out. I'll post it here when I can. Should be out today sometime.

Thanks in advance. Armando posted some PFF info about it. He mentioned that Howard was targeted like 13 times (most of any CB week 2).

"The thing is, the Dolphins didn’t play a lot of press-man on Sunday. There was a lot of zoney stuff back there.)" - Armando Salguero
 
Last edited:
Thanks in advance. Armando posted some PFF info about it. He mentioned that Howard was targeted like 13 times (most of any CB week 2).

"The thing is, the Dolphins didn’t play a lot of press-man on Sunday. There was a lot of zoney stuff back there.)" - Armando Salguero

It's not that cut & dry. I'll explain. If the ball is on the hashes to either side, or if the offense is aligned in an unbalanced offensive set, it can alter coverages and make them a combination of 2 out of 3 possible coverages (man, zone, and/or pattern match).

An example is if there are 3 receivers to the fieldside (longest area of the field) and 1 receiver to the boundary (short area of the field) the single DB on the boundary can be in man coverages on the one reciever, while on the fieldside the DB's can be playing zone or pattern match over the trips receivers.

Here's a visual for reference for that example with Man over the single receiver and Pattern Match over the trips receivers. Look at the top visual for the defensive keys:

CsCZjwBWEAAp_Wy.jpg

The single backside CB is in MEG (Man Everywhere he Goes)/Cone (signifies FS help over the top).

Over the trips side the strongside DB also has man coverage here, but the Slot, Money backer (noted by $, similar to a SLB), and Strong Safety (SS) all have different keys and responsibilities depending on the route concepts being used. That is what is referred to as Pattern Match.

This is why sites like PFF can not be relied on for such information, or even the grades they distribute, because these things are not taken into account when they simply imply man or zone coverages; it's not always that simple. Specific coverages must be determined because you also have to ID who is actually responsible for which receiver and who made a mistake in their keys or reads if/when it occurs.
 
Last edited:
PFF seems to assign (or blame) targets based on proximity or who made the tackle.

If Rivers completed 31 passes, I find it a little hard to believe that 13 of those (42%) we completed against Howard in coverage.
 
Back
Top Bottom