Discussion in 'NFL Draft Forum' started by FinAtic8480, Apr 13, 2014.
It'll be interesting to see how highly they rate Murray - if they view him as a guy to draft around the 5th as a back up or a guy to maybe draft in the 3rd as a backup plan for Tannehill.
Save for raw physical tools (which are important), Murray is better than Tannehill in just about every way.
A lot of day 2 buzz here right now...makes sense to me...him and mettenberger....
If we could finally give u in devlin and Moore, and replace them with Murray I'd be so happy.
I have no clue how those two have managed to take up roster spots for so long, Moore especially.
Murray if 5th round pick.
Won't be surprised if mettenberger come may 8th has a team trade back into late 1st round for him...should be gone by pick 50...
I think so. If healthy, I have him right there with Bortles - easily the better passer.
Let the guy play one game in the league before saying he is already a better pro than Tannehill.
I like Murray a lot....saw him play high school ball....anyone who start 4 years in the SEC and has success is always worth a look.
I didn't say he was a better pro than Tannehill.
Pull the trigger if he makes it to the 4th.. Grades out higher than EJ/Geno/ Glennon
---------- Post added at 02:11 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:10 AM ----------
In this league, QB's are currency