The Dolphins Future

Discussion in 'Miami Dolphins Forum' started by Cape Cod FinFan, Oct 18, 2004.

  1. Cape Cod FinFan

    Cape Cod FinFan Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2004
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Is it just me or do others feel that AJ feeley should be given the starting job for the next 10 games regardless of the outcome. I feel they should give the coaching staff (and future HC where ever he may be) the chance to anylise aj. Aj is basically a rookie and needs some experience and coaching as a starter for the coaching staff to judge wether or not he is capable of being a good starter in the future for the dolphins. I dont want the dolphins with the high pick that we are going to have use it on a qb unless feeley is not capable. I would rather them use it on another need.
     
  2. darkoak

    darkoak Banned Hammered

    Joined:
    May 2004
    Messages:
    1,627
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    100% right.
     
  3. PA_FinsFan

    PA_FinsFan The Bills make me want to....puke

    Joined:
    Aug 2004
    Messages:
    87
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I agree
     
  4. A/C Dorsal

    A/C Dorsal Historic Franchise Pride

    Joined:
    Sep 2003
    Messages:
    305
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    has anyone even seen Sage play at all? do we even know if he would suck? we watched Feely suck... why not have a chance to watch Sage suck too. we could really know by then end of the season which one sucks the most... i put my early bet on Jay.
     
  5. fins4o8

    fins4o8 Mac

    Joined:
    Feb 2004
    Messages:
    1,467
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0

    because we spent a 2nd rounder on AJ & with how the season is progressing that 2nd rounder is looking like the 33rd pick.
     
  6. NJFINSFAN1

    NJFINSFAN1 FinHeaven Elite

    Joined:
    Aug 2004
    Messages:
    24,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I would say 3 or 4 games for Feeley, then give Sage his shot!
     
  7. Johnnymost

    Johnnymost Over Worked

    Joined:
    Aug 2004
    Messages:
    214
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    We made the investment in Feeley. We need to see what he can do over the remainder of this season. Then decide if we need to draft a QB.
     
  8. PhinsTD

    PhinsTD Phins fanatic

    Joined:
    Jul 2002
    Messages:
    4,375
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Sage has not done anything to earn the shot. He hasn't performed in practice, that's how you earn more PT.

    Feeley didn't earn it either, he was given a shot due to money and picks given up.

    They all have sucked and shown very little that makes you think they'll develop into a good starter.

    Feeley is not anywhere near a rookie. He has been in an NFL offense, lifestyle, strength program. Add to all this he has had the years to mature physically and emotionally.

    He may not have played much, but he sure as heck isn't even close to being a rookie.
     
  9. wonderl33t

    wonderl33t FinHeaven VIP Finheaven VIP Donator

    Joined:
    Jul 2003
    Messages:
    2,001
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    38
    it's looking bleak, I guess Feeley should get more reps, but it's hard to know the right way to distribute PT when none of the moves we make result in any sort of success
     
  10. dolphindude13

    dolphindude13 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2004
    Messages:
    892
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I totally disagree with you....he basically IS a rookie....4 carreer starts in 3 years doesn't begin to qualify as a veteran! Throw in the fact that he's with a new team, new scheme, new city....etc....I will give you 1 thing though.....a rookie would get a hell of a lot more chance to prove himself than 2 1/2 games with a pathetic O-Line. I posted a reply on another thread about Peyton Mannings first 5 games....check it out and see if they should have benched him!:fire:
     

Share This Page