pigskinguy said:I am not running I have made it clear where I stand on Fiedler as have you. Neither of us are going to waver. I think you give him too much credit. You think I don't give him enough. I am not running I am just tired of talking about it. I still believe whayt i have said. But if want continue to go on and on and on about Feidler than I guess we can. I am just getting a little bored with it right now. But I guess if you want to think that I am running away, than that is fair enough, I suppose. If Feidler wins the job and is named the starter i am sure we will have lots to talk about during the season.
Damn it! I not supposed to be talking about it anymore. :D Frikkin addiction to this team!
Okay, I give up. You just will never get the point. MY DISAGREEMENT WAS NEVER ABOUT FIEDLER'S ABILITIES. I have stated more than once that I would not disagree with anyone who said that they didn't believe Fiedler was good enough.
Here is a direct quote from an earlier post to you:
I'm not trying to convince you that Fiedler is a good QB. I'm only pointing out that your arguments as to why you feel he is not a good QB are FACTUALLY WRONG.
You are still entitled to your opinion of Fiedler's abilities....
I only objected to the 'facts' you used to make your argument. How can you still be confused on that point? The reason why this debate has gone on so long is that (despite my attempts to make it clear) we were debating different things.
There is an old saying....it is morally wrong to allow a fool to keep his money.
My philosophy is that it is morally wrong to allow blatantly untrue statements to go unchallenged. You have made numerous untrue statements. When I point out the error, you simply move on to a different untrue statement.