russianbear
Club Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2011
- Messages
- 5,594
- Reaction score
- 2,017
I haven't seen anything to date that tells me Adam Gase's success as a head coach will have more to do with anything but how well he gets his quarterback to play.
Last year his quarterback played poorly to start the season, and so did the team. When his quarterback played much better, so did the team.
This year his quarterbacks have played very poorly, and so has his team.
That tells me the jury should still be out on whether he's truly head coach material, or simply someone who should be viewed as an offensive coordinator who may have the ability to maximize his quarterback's play.
What indicators would tell you the coach is responsible for wins any more or less than QB play? IE: what type of correlations with wins would identify the head coach is moving the needle?
As for the OP...I think people typically have a grass is greener take when coaches either speak honestly and openly or don't say anything at all. I remember when Joe Philbin used to keep his lips tight at the pressers after a loss...typical lines "whole team let us down" "we let the team down" "everyone needs to do better" "work on it and try to get better" etc etc...we were roasting him for the coach speak. Now we have a firemouth speaking bluntly and with emotion and certain people don't like it....
To me Gase has done very well considering what he's had at QB. Yes, he brought in Cutler, but I liked the risk at the time and thought it was a good chance to take. Our alternative was Moore or relying on another one of the mediocre FA agents to come in and get comfort and absorb the offense. With his options, Cutler was the obvious choice, he just looks like absolute crap.
He's had some bad signings, but I take that with Tannenbaum as well and Gase trying to compensate for what was a handicapped season LOSING OUR STARTING QB. That's the biggest emphasis to me, so those giving him shade after this year....not justified IMO.