FIN-IN-RI
☠️ Banned ☠️
It would be nice if Cleo lemon was some kind of diamond in the rough..
phinfan2003 said:4. Linehan is gone.
3. We won't restructure his contract to give him the kind of money he wants to stay and therefore he'll be cut and signed by St. Louis as a backup.
2. Mularkey will implement his offense which I'm assuming Frerotte will know very little of.
1. Mularkey's best QB's have had completion % of 60.2, 62.1, 57.4, 56.9, and 67.4 in the past 5 years and accuracy isn't Frerotte's strong suit.
I know I'm just guessing here and I realize we'll need a veteran QB when we draft a young QB to be the long term solution but I just don't see Frerotte being that stop gap. If Holcomb is a FA (which I don't know if he is or not), he may be this year's version of Frerotte but a little more accurate.
phinfan2003 said:I'm not saying that Holcomb is our saviour and he's the missing piece. I'm just saying that he's more accurate than Frerotte and if we're looking for a veteran QB to be a stop-gap, who has exp. playing in Mularkey's system (much the same way Frerotte was last yr. w/ Linehan) then we have 3 choices:
Holcomb
Maddox
Stewart
Out of these 3, I think I'd take Holcomb. He's not my #1 choice for QB for next year but neither is Frerotte.
BlueFin said:Kordell Stewart wasn't the most accurate QB either, neither was Maddox.
Gamezover said:Are u serious??? All three of them are downgrades whether they played in Mularkey's system or not. We can't keep settling for one year QBs. We need to bring somebody in that will be here and contribute for the long run. Brooks is at least better than these guys, but i hope he's not the answer. How about Matt Schuab??
FiN.in.RI said:It would be nice if Cleo lemon was some kind of diamond in the rough..
phinfan2003 said:4. Linehan is gone.
3. We won't restructure his contract to give him the kind of money he wants to stay and therefore he'll be cut and signed by St. Louis as a backup.
2. Mularkey will implement his offense which I'm assuming Frerotte will know very little of.
1. Mularkey's best QB's have had completion % of 60.2, 62.1, 57.4, 56.9, and 67.4 in the past 5 years and accuracy isn't Frerotte's strong suit.
I know I'm just guessing here and I realize we'll need a veteran QB when we draft a young QB to be the long term solution but I just don't see Frerotte being that stop gap. If Holcomb is a FA (which I don't know if he is or not), he may be this year's version of Frerotte but a little more accurate.
trate121hb said:NO AARON ON THIS TEAM PLEASE!!! I'll take Kitna or keep Frerrotte..
Mularkey's style of offense won't be much different than Linehan's. I am sure Saban and Mueller will do good and put the right pieces together.
TO #81 WILL BE A FIN!!!!
:goof:
FiN.in.RI said:It would be nice if Cleo lemon was some kind of diamond in the rough..
phinfan2003 said:Are you reading my posts!?!?!?!?!
ATS16 said:4.) Linehan is gone yes, but Saban is still here and Frerotte wouldn't have been brought if Saban didn't like him.
3.) Gus has already said he's willing to restructure
2.) If we do implement a new system Gus would be as much in the dark as the rest of the team
1.) Gus's low completion % wasn't strictly his fault there were also a lot of drops
And Saban talked about building on the Chemistry from this year which the offense began to do in the second half so sorry but I gonna have to respectfully disagree. I see Frerotte around for at least one more year regardless of the OC change.