trate121hb said:Hey Boom,
I hate the Seminoles but I love their big 3 this year with Bunkley Sims and Cromartie....I would be ecstatic if we can get Sims in the 1st and a guy like Wroten in the 3rd. My question: Out of those 3 guys who would you want to see in a Fins Uni and why???? And do you think Wroten will be available in the 3rd???? I read an article on him and even though he's had some off field issues...the guy has a world of talent....
It's really a big four because Kamerion Wimbley could go off the board before any of them and is a very viable proposition for us at pick 16. Ernie is a very good player and whilst he's a tad undersized heightwise for the scheme, there's no arguing with the talent. As for big Claude, I'll be very, VERY suprised if he's on the board at what our pick in R2 was let alone R3.
Who would I want to see? Tough question. Bunkley and Sims probably contribute more in 2006/7. The overall ceiling is higher on Cromartie. Look at the comparisons - tough to do I know, but humour me. Bunkley is, according to Bobby Bowden, himself a pretty shrewd judge of talent, the best DT to come down the pipe in Tallahassee in a decade, which is saying something considering the college career of Andre Wadsworth, Darnell Dockett, Travis Johnson, etc. We look at him as Miami's Richard Seymour if you will. The ability to play DE or NT in a 3-4 and three technique tackle in a 4-3, with pass rush ability. If you run straight at him, then there are problems, but he's had an outstanding offseason and he's as strong as an ox. At times you'd like to see him use his hands better, but he's a heck of a talent. There are some off field issues and injury issues - stealing a video game from Wal Mart and an ACL tear at high school.
Sims' comparison is Derrick Brooks. High School legend, from a football family, he's a huge talent who has played the SLB and the WLB spot. He's very tough and hits like a train. He's quick, strong, has a great motor, rangy, can cover, very quick, plays with a great base, but he can be undisciplined, he can leave cutback lanes open, he can get engulfed at the point and he plays out of control. Again he has issues off the field and with injuries - specifically concussions.
The Cromartie comparison to Deion Sanders was made by Mickey Andrews. I won't be so bold. But the ceiling is huge. I mean huge. Great talent, hugely athletic, great hips, playmaker, aggressive going for the ball, plays the run, very quick, great instincts and anticipation. He's high risk/high reward but I think it's worth it. The injury issues - torn ACL, MCL and torn hamstring - are a concern for sure and he won't contribute much in 2006, but he can be anything you want to be if he 'trains on'.
So take the comparisons for what they're worth and ask yourself 'do you want the next Richard Seymour, the next Derrick Brooks or the next Deion Sanders?' If those comparisons come even remotely close to being fulfilled, then you have to go with Cromartie.