Not sure if serious? Are you talking about '12,'14,'15 and '17 where he didnt post a better rating than 81.4? So what you're really saying is that if the Fins were to sign him, they'd get the 2013 version(5 years ago) or the 2017 version on a SB team(3 games)...
I agree here but then why not just deal with Tannehill 1 more year
you clearly have more time to look at stats than I do, but if I were looking at his stats, I'd start here and not espn. https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/F/FoleNi00/gamelog/ second, at least foles has had postseason success, and foles is at least as good as tannehill, without the wear and tear of 250 sacks over 90 games. If you want to toss out foles worst games and compare him to an equal number of tannehill's best games, foles is going to win that little contest.
sorry I don't buy this thinking, we've also drafted a first round QB before and it worked out, and then it didn't. should we avoid drafting QBs in the first round just because we drafted one that didn't work out?
here's a cool tool on PFR, you can compare players side by side... I dont use espn either...
thanks. even less effort, I'd definately trade a beat up broken down model from 2012 for a less used same or greater V6 model until I can afford the V8.
The way I see it, Foles, Tannehill, and pretty much every QB from top 7 to top 20 is basically the same guy... If you absolutely want to move on from that guy, then go a different way... Either go for rookie upside(draft) or over the hill greatness(Peyton Manning in Denver)...
that's the thing though, two months ago, everyone was all about waiting until 2020 because there were zero qbs worth taking a chance on in this upcoming draft. Now, we have a buncha "happy adjusters" suddenly convinced that some of these guys are worth drafting. what changed?
meh I don't know his reasons for staying, I can't fault a guy for wanting to stay with a team and city he loves, after all Marino had a choice and chose to retire rather than put on a vikings uniform.
We'll just get this out of the way first because there's a good discussion to have beyond the QBs one... Lets just agree to disagree on our evaluation of Foles vs Tannehill... I think the only times Foles outplayed Tannehill was when he was on a SB roster... I think Tannehill is better and you dont and thats fine...
I'd agree with the t0o many holes to fill and we won't have the cap to do it after cutting tannehill this season regardless, best we keep a few of our future talent (#25) and let some of the dead weight and soon to be paid more than they bring talent at the door. If anything maybe we cut a buncha players that won't be here in two years, eat the cap this season, tank, and grab a 1st round qb. might as well run with fales, or watch tannehill get killed.
