I mean pointing to one instance doesnt make it a common misconception. I can show you certain highlights of tannehill moving outside of the pocket dropping dimes but that's not gonna change the narrative on him. Maybe Haskins can overcome it but I think you are gonna see Haskins look more like Goff the last 6-7 games of this year. Deer in the headlights.
Also, we arent that right environment. He will be coming onto a team with a shotty oline (****ty Defense) and defensive guy as a head coach. Former WR coach as OC. Not knocking the coaches but that wouldnt describe the "right environment" to me. We just need to take our lumps this year if we cant get Murray which looks like a pipe dream at the moment. I want a guy that doesnt need the greatest environment to succeed. If I have to wait a year for that, so be it.
I’m a big buckeye fan and watched every haskins throw. That Maryland game was exactly how you said. The defense at that point was dolphins vs Houston on tnf bad. The runnin backs for Ohio state last year were as bad as I’ve seen in quite a long time. Haskins is the real deal. His pocket presence and ability to extend the play were soooo me better by years end. He’s already ahead of Tannehill in the pocket presence and reading defenses departments.It's the small sample size, he's only a one year starter. People have been very quick to write him off as immobile. Most of those folks formed that opinion during those first few games where it should have been perfect-ably understandable for anyone to be a little timid a need some time to find their feet. There is a reason I linked the Maryland game here, I watched that game live and you have to understand the context of the game here. Ohio State were getting mauled by little Maryland, the D couldn't get off the field, there was little running game for Haskins to lean upon, he had to put the team on his back and win it virtually by himself. He accounted for 6 TDs or something in that game and he grew up, from that point on he was lights out down the stretched, with a very very strong Michigan D next up, look at what he did against them. For one year starters it's very much not how you start but how you finish.
I'm impressed with Haskins. In this quarterback class, I feel its just two that have the potential to be top-10 type quarterbacks with Murray and Haskins. A lot depends on what situations they get into obviously. I sense that Haskins would have what the new coaching staff is looking for. That's just my gut feeling, though, and most likely Miami would need to trade ahead of the NY Giants to do that. From 13 to number 4 or 5 would be costly, but not if Haskins is the real deal.I’m a big buckeye fan and watched every haskins throw. That Maryland game was exactly how you said. The defense at that point was dolphins vs Houston on tnf bad. The runnin backs for Ohio state last year were as bad as I’ve seen in quite a long time. Haskins is the real deal. His pocket presence and ability to extend the play were soooo me better by years end. He’s already ahead of Tannehill in the pocket presence and reading defenses departments.
I don’t understand your point.
That sounds awfully like somebody making excuses for a QB. Oh the irony...It's the small sample size, he's only a one year starter. People have been very quick to write him off as immobile. Most of those folks formed that opinion during those first few games where it should have been perfect-ably understandable for anyone to be a little timid a need some time to find their feet. There is a reason I linked the Maryland game here, I watched that game live and you have to understand the context of the game here. Ohio State were getting mauled by little Maryland, the D couldn't get off the field, there was little running game for Haskins to lean upon, he had to put the team on his back and win it virtually by himself. He accounted for 6 TDs or something in that game and he grew up, from that point on he was lights out down the stretched, with a very very strong Michigan D next up, look at what he did against them. For one year starters it's very much not how you start but how you finish.
Conviction on a QB is irrelevant. An opinion on a QB is completely irrelevant. It does not matter what you, Dan Marino, or Chris Grier, or anyone else thinks.
Five years from now does not matter.
It does not matter what you or anyone else thinks of Russell Wilson, Mahomes, Payton Manning. Opinion is irrelevant.
You mentioned some players and same applies to them and any other QB. It does not matter what anyone thinks. That includes Chris Grier, Dan Marino, Caldewell, Shula, Belichick. It's completely irrelevant what they think.
That sounds awfully like somebody making excuses for a QB. Oh the irony...
No, deciding X-year is the year we're drafting a QB in the first round and then didn't prepare for it whatsoever is how we ended up with Tannehill instead of Luck.Deciding that X-year is the year we’re drafting a QB in the first round come hell or high water is how we ended up with Tannehill.
The odds are better that the 2019 Dolphins win the Super Bowl than that the Dolphins were going to be in position to draft Luck in 2012. And the 2019 Dolphins aren’t getting anywhere near the Super Bowl without tickets.No, deciding X-year is the year we're drafting a QB in the first round and then didn't prepare for it whatsoever is how we ended up with Tannehill instead of Luck.
I don't think anyone does....his posts look so incredibly closed-minded as well as just plain bizarre.....