I want picks this year not next - i like how deep the 2019 talent is at certain positions.
I am sure they will look at that if they see a player they want. They will have the ammo to be flexible.I want picks this year not next - i like how deep the 2019 talent is at certain positions.
yes it could beHow about this year and then some. It could be a little of both.
I'm thinking it's only a 6th because of the 1 year contract. I wonder if it was like a 3 year deal if we would have received a better pick.
A win would of been a 5th (or a 4th with eating salary . . .they were never getting a third, even if they ate the whole thing).
A 6th is a win for both teams.
Even though we paid a 4th just a year ago, he’s a year older coming off a healthy season where, lets face it, he underperformed . . .in a system that he should of excelled.
He didn’t win nearly enough as he should of. He definitely wasn’t terrible, but he wasn’t a $13 million dollar cap guy either IMO.
In the end, its a good deal for Miami, who would of likely cut him and for Dallas, who lost Gregory.
Hey, getting a draft pick for him was a good deal … I'm not complaining. I'll take a 6th over just releasing him any day!Me too, but I’ll f****** take it! Chris Grier is the man!
No, that's my point.So you're expecting a competitive roster the very same season we've shredded our roster of the heavy veteran talent. Tell me, How exactly does that work?
My objection is everything, everything is wrong. It starts with the owner who is willing to pay 5 million dollars for a fourth round pick in 2020, just dishing cash out to a departing player; to Chris Grier who has the nerve to ask for that and do it, and increase the cap hit this year so he can play around and "improve" the team "next year." That stuff should not even be mentioned between normal people.
My objection is to the five year plan, because there is no such thing. There is only one plan, one standard, and that is to win now, do now, get sht done now. Otherwise it is a dereliction of duty. They are fkn around.
My objection is that they have not traded up yet for the most important thing, the QB.
My objection is to scrapping the DE position because it creates holes unnecessarily. Robert Quinn is perfectly fine at DE, and not too expensive. Quinn had 6.5 sacks and is paid 12 mil, and that is just fine. He was on a contract for one more year.
My objection is they will use draft capital unnecessarily to fill holes they created! It's a waste of time and resources, and it is damaging.
My objection is to paying Quinn 1.1 million to have a right to trade him for a "late rounds" pick. It's a waste of cash and cap room, and it goes back to dereliction of duty to do now. It is just mind boggling to waste cash and cap like that.
My objection is with infatuation with late rounds picks which are of negligible value, 80 points at best in fourth round instead of keeping a perfectly fine player to help the team this season.
Wasting cash, wasting cap, scrapping the team, intentionally creating holes, selling a pipe dream of results in the future, not getting critical things done. It's all a part of Chris Grier overall fraud.
Totally disagree with you brother. We got a 6th, and only payed a little over a million of his salary. We didn't have to pay a huge part of his salary to make the deal. The way I look at this something was better than nothing if we would have released him.A 4th would have been a win, a 5th would have been even, a 6th (and if the Boys have a good season it is close to a 7th) is a loss.
A 4th would have been a win, a 5th would have been even, a 6th (and if the Boys have a good season it is close to a 7th) is a loss.
Great take. But hey who cares if it just justifies the loosing we will be enduring the next 3 years just hoping we chose the right coach and QB. Of course now instead of a 3 year plan to find out if we made another bad choice we have to wait and see over 5 years plus loose alot in the meanwhile.What a ridiculous take