Pretty sure most are on board with trading down if we are not going to take a QB. Problem is you need someone to fall to 13 that warrents a trade up.
Last edited:
Pretty sure everyone is on board with trading down if we are not going to take a QB. Problem is you need soemone to fall to 13 that warrents a trade up.
At pick #13, I don't see why we couldn't trade back and get the Raiders #24 and #27. Our team has way too many holes to fill, so I have no problem getting more picks. If we cant get the QB at #13, then absolutely trade back.
Exactly. The idea of trading down merely for roster fillers makes no sense to me. Have to know who's available. I think it's highly unlikely top 10 talent doesn't fall to 13 as QBs and combine warriors move up.
Precisely. When the top 3 QBs come off the board there's bound to be a very tasty treat waiting for us!
It could be quite interesting regarding a possible trade down -- if we go in that direction we need
excellent value! I'd be happy with a mid to lower 20s R1 and R2 in return.
The top 100 seems pretty robust for that kind of move.
But if we stay @13 we need to land an immediate impact starter.
Round 2 simply isn't valuable enough for me to drop down to the mid twenties. I want next year's 1st rounder and more to keep me from immediately hanging up.
Well R2 19 should = R1 20. But if you want more... Maybe too greedy to get 'er done?