Found Something Interesting...... | Page 2 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Found Something Interesting......

The moment we signed Fitzpatrick I thought all of the tank talk should have stopped. He will have bad games for sure but hes also going to have games where he either lights it up or make few enough mistakes to win us some games. Also despite what many think we definitely have the skill players on offense to create mismatches and win games. Now with all of that said yes the OL is hot garbage, so no we will not be a good team but we wont be the worst team either.
 
CoryMatthews said:
Attn Tanneshills.

Fitzpatrick’s Any/a the last 5 years combined is higher than the previous **** qbs best season ever. It is a huge upgrade.

Tannehill would be out of the league if he was drafted by any team other than the dolphins.
Click to expand...

The original post is about Ryan Fitpatrick and has nothing to do with your boogey man Tannehill.

You missed the point, then again why does this not suprize me?? :lol:

The OP is using Fitzpatrick's 5 1/2 game sample size VS QB's that played 85-90% of the season in the 2018.

It's a poor choice to put Ryan Fitpatrick QB ranking against any NFL QB in the past 5 years. He's played 1 full season in 6 years (2015) and 3 full seasons in his 13 year career.

You being the Ryan Tannehill quarterback whisperer I'd think would be smart enough to know that partial season QB's will rank higher than full season QB's.
 
Phindog said:
The original post is about Ryan Fitpatrick and has nothing to do with your boogey man Tannehill.

You missed the point, then again why does this not suprize me?? :lol:

The OP is using Fitzpatrick's 5 1/2 game sample size VS QB's that played 85-90% of the season in the 2018.

It's a poor choice to put Ryan Fitpatrick QB ranking against any NFL QB in the past 5 years. He's played 1 full season in 6 years (2015) and 3 full seasons in his 13 year career.

You being the Ryan Tannehill quarterback whisperer I'd think would be smart enough to know that partial season QB's will rank higher than full season QB's.
Click to expand...

And I am using the last 5 years vs Tannehill best year ever and Fitzpatrick still comes out on top.

It’s funny how tannehill sucks so bad that your argument is simply that he played more full seasons LOOOOLLL.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
CoryMatthews said:
And I am using the last 5 years vs tanneshits best year ever and Fitzpatrick still comes out on top.

It’s funny how tannehill sucks so bad that your argument is simply that he played more full seasons LOOOOLLL.
Click to expand...

- Saw "CoryMatthews" as the last poster in the thread.
- Thought "I bet he's stirring crap up about Tannehill again."
- Looked, was not disappointed. Saddened, but not disappointed.
 
MrChadRico said:
But statistically he sucks alot less than what weve had... statistics prove it.
Click to expand...

So we should be happy then? Our QB sucks a little less? **** that. He serves a purpose, which is to put us in position to get a real QB in 2020, but no one should be excited about him. Good QBs don’t bounce around the league.
 
Phindog said:
It's not that cool if you look at it properly.You're getting excited on a QB that started only 5 games?

Horrible sample size on all your QB's especially Fitzpatrick.

Ryan Fitzpatrick Started 5 games , Winston started 11 games

Josh Allen started 12 games missed 4 games (Injury)

Baker Mayfield started 14 games, missed the first 2 (Rookie)

Rosen started 13 games, missed the first 3 (Rookie)

Tannehill started 11 games missed 5 games (injury)

Darnold started 13 games, missed 3 games (injury)

Lamar Jackson started 7 games , Flacco started 9 games
Click to expand...

I find myself in the unusual circumstance of siding with MrChadRico here. There are no perfect comparisons in the NFL...the sample sizes aren't perfect, but they're certainly relevant.
 
MrChadRico said:
But statistically he sucks alot less than what weve had... statistics prove it.
Click to expand...

Statistics never prove anything, they can't. They are qualified by "confidence levels", not proofs!

They determine probabilities, nothing more then that. The science is in how to make the determination that gives you a most probable outcome given the information available or what other information might be useful to make a better determination.
 
MrChadRico said:
It's weird your so negative on draft day
Click to expand...

It's still officially the off season until 8pm tonight and It's weird you'd use the pre-draft day to want to ignore facts.

MrChadRico said:
what's your agenda here? You seem clearly angry for no obvious reason.
Click to expand...

Where do you see anger?? You seem defensive???

MrChadRico said:
I never said one thing about playing time, I said it was interesting.
Click to expand...

I know you didn't, which is why I pointed out how important playing time is when ranking QB's.

MrChadRico said:
I never said it was 100% accurate just that it was interesting.
Click to expand...

I know it wasn't 100% accurate which is why I pointed it out your flaw.

MrChadRico said:
You clearly dont like Fitzpatrick, my only question is why?
Click to expand...

I'll appreciate Fitzpatrick as much as one can on a QB who's playing on his 8th team in 14 seasons that's started 3 full seasons.

MrChadRico said:
Are you related to Tannehill?
Click to expand...

I was related to him when he was a Miami Dolphin, now I am related to Ryan Fitzpatrick for the time being.
 
The Goat said:
I find myself in the unusual circumstance of siding with MrChadRico here. There are no perfect comparisons in the NFL...the sample sizes aren't perfect, but they're certainly relevant.
Click to expand...

Sample sizes need to be close If you want to side with someone using a 5 1/2 game season vs QB's that played 85% of the season all the power to you.

Also out of the 5/12 games he played he was benched twice for James Winston.
 
Phindog said:
Sample sizes need to be close If you want to side with someone using a 5 1/2 game season vs QB's that played 85% of the season all the power to you.

Also out of the 5/12 games he played he was benched twice for James Winston.
Click to expand...

You will not find me in the camp who feels Fitzpatrick is superior to Tannehill. My point is that you can't dismiss the comparisons out of hand because of the sample size, particularly when there are similar, larger sample sizes from past seasons. Now...all that being said? I'd take Mike Evans, Chris Godwin, OJ Howard and Cameron Brate over what the Fins were trotting out there for most of the season.

Also, worse <> less entertaining.
 
The Goat said:
You will not find me in the camp who feels Fitzpatrick is superior to Tannehill. My point is that you can't dismiss the comparisons out of hand because of the sample size, particularly when there are similar, larger sample sizes from past seasons. Now...all that being said? I'd take Mike Evans, Chris Godwin, OJ Howard and Cameron Brate over what the Fins were trotting out there for most of the season.

Also, worse <> less entertaining.
Click to expand...

My point being is the more games one playes the more their rank drops.

I think we're all pretty realisitic on what we're getting out of Fitzpatrick. But to think if he infact played a full 16 game season I highly doubt he'd be in the top 15 QBR.
 
Is junk still trolling this thread on an alt. Still mad Sanchez was such a bust and became a career backup at 25 and out of the league the same age other qbs are in their prime.
 
Phindog said:
My point being is the more games one playes the more their rank drops.

I think we're all pretty realisitic on what we're getting out of Fitzpatrick. But to think if he infact played a full 16 game season I highly doubt he'd be in the top 15 QBR.
Click to expand...

Agreed.
 
Another way of bashing a player that is no longer on the team. But oh this is my draft day hype.
Move on let’s talk about what’s coming up in the draft and the possibility’s that are in front of us.
We all know that Tannehill scorned you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom