0-line Rankings | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

0-line Rankings

No mention of Houck and or Davis the new coaches and they list Alabi as a RT instead of LT. They are a bit short on facts and analysis. This "projection" is simply a rehash of last year.

New coaches, new scheme, a year working together for many of them and another year in a weight program, no lingering injuries and I think we should be an average or better line. Top ten???? Maybe but that would need all the stars to align. Right now I think we did all that we could have done in the off season. Let's see what happens when the pads come on.
 
It's based on last season and we basically have the same players. I thought it was pretty realistic, We don't have a good O-Line fellas. Now if Houck can work "magic" and transform these scrubs into NFL players we might be "alright".
 
I'm every bit as concerned about this as I was two days ago when last we talked about the same article (which was not much at all). If I were writing an article not as a homer, I would put us there as well. I would include some talk abut how the team would probably outperform and make my forecast look foolish given the presence of Houck, though.
 
KGUNBILLS said:
O-line Rankings

Dolphins at 32.
Click to expand...

There were offenses last season that were worse than ours. Believe it or not!!! It all starts up front.

Sports writers don't like question marks. If you have any they will always choose for them to fail. They like names.

Our O-line probably won't be the NFL's best in 2005 but it definetly won't be the worst either.

By the way I haven't even opened the article yet. I will as soon as I'm done posting.

If KC isn't number 1 the article is complete garbage.
 
F150&Dolfan said:
There were offenses last season that were worse than ours. Believe it or not!!! It all starts up front.

Sports writers don't like question marks. If you have any they will always choose for them to fail. They like names.

Our O-line probably won't be the NFL's best in 2005 but it definetly won't be the worst either.

By the way I haven't even opened the article yet. I will as soon as I'm done posting.

If KC isn't number 1 the article is complete garbage.
Click to expand...

OK. at least they had #1 right. the Pats should be higher. It seems like Tom Brady could eat a sandwich before getting rid of the ball and Dillon had 1600+ yards last year.
 
how does the RB effect the O-line rating? they were lucky to list 1 O-Line guy per team. who cares who the QB is, or the RB or whatever.

i was expecting a list rating the O-Line. and i got a list of a bunch of QBs and RBs. a pointless list.
 
Uh-oh! Jills are only 23rd!!

Looks like your season's over too with that weak group. Guess there's no reason to play this next season then.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom