Philter25
MORE COWBELL!!!
kastofsna120 said:what the hell are you talking about? palmer's first year was damn good. that's the worst example you could've possibly come up with
In 2003, when Palmer was drafted, what were his numbers? If 0's across the board is a "damn good" year for you, then I agree. Take that to the bank smart@$$.
My point was its a 2-3 year evaluation period for QBs. You cant tell how good they are after their first year, point being PALMER DIDNT PLAY his first year. Why didnt he play? Because it takes time for rookie QBs to learn the offense. Rookie QBs on a wholescale level either a) struggle their first year, b) spend most or ALL of the year on the bench to learn the offense, c) have freak years like Roethlisberger which happens once every decade.
Want other examples? How about Drew Brees? Peyton Manning had an iffy first year. Eli Manning had an iffy first year. Heck, Jake Delhomme had a horrible first FIVE years in the league. Would you call any of these guys busts because they struggled or had limited action in their first year?
All these guys either had limited action their first year struggling when they played or spent a lot of time onthe bench learning the offense.