Actually, I like the idea of starting in the trenches, but I have to nitpick a bit. Building an Offensive Line is a process, and I wholeheartedly support building the OL ASAP in a rebuilding effort. I also give Ireland & Co. high marks for building this offensive line exactly how they should, by putting your best lineman (Vernon Carey) at his best position (RT), drafting the dominant talent for your system as high as possible at LT (Jake Long perfectly fits our system), recognizing your strong talent on the interior in Satele (C) and bringing in a high production/high leadership/veteran free agent (Smiley) for a low amount of money. Having that solid veteran and leader next to Satele is crucial for getting the line calls right, and Smiley is an excellent pulling guard allowing us to run left behind Jake. That's 4 of the 5 line spots handled perfectly. A+ to Ireland & Co. for building our OL so well.
It's debatable how important guards are, but I like that we've identified guys who can grow with our system like Mormino and supplemented that through the draft with guys who have a lot of potential like Shawn Murphy and Donald Thomas. While I'd rather have had different developmental prospects, the ones we took all have potential and were good picks late in the draft.
So, Offensive Line, absolutely the most important thing to start the rebuilding process and we've done an excellent job. At worst we'll need 1 more starter at G next year, and those are easy to find. At best, someone steps forward and our line starts to jell together. Chemistry makes an offensive line greater than the sum of it's parts, and we're starting from ground zero with the right mix of talent, youth, veterans, leadership, and philosophy.
The flip side is that defenses work very differently than offenses do. There is no single unit that requires chemistry on defense like the offensive line. Defenses require execution of individuals doing their roles in the system. CB's, Safeties, ILB's and OLB's all need to read and react. The defensive line is really 3 different individuals working individually against the OL and tee'ing up the ball for the LB's. So, it's not needed to start building the defense with the defensive line. Any part of the defense can work, and it tends to be better when there's a mix of veterans and youth in the secondary and LB corps. So, it would have been nice to add 1 LB and 1 CB in this draft. We had the opportunity to do so, and we didn't.
Now, Yeremiah Bell has proven 2 things, 1) that he has enough talent to start, and 2) that he is going to get injured every single season. We have no talent to back him up. If he's our veteran back there, we're going to suffer greatly. What's even worse, we have no real talented veteran to back him up and we ignored the secondary completely in the draft. We have 1 decent corner, Will Allen. Lehan and all the rest are mediocre at best, and we let about 20 good CB's slip through our hands this draft. I think that will come back to haunt us down the road.
At LB we probably can make due with the conglomeration of veterns we have, so it's no longer a pressing need after acquiring Torbor, Anderson, Ayodele and not trading Jason Taylor. We also have Joey Porter who should do just fine back in the 34. So while it would have been useful to get a good young LB (like Dan Connor!), it's not neccessary.
We needed DL and we got 2 keepers and 1 potential developmental guy. I think that's probably too many, but that's the way the draft developed. I think we took Merling simply because he fell to us, then we overdrafted Langford because he's an ideal prospect for our system. I'd rather we picked up a CB instead of Merling, grabbed a TE like Jermichael Finley somewhere along the way, and it would have been very nice to snag LB Kroy Biermann, but my solace is that I think we were targeting stealing him in the 6th round and Atlanta gazumped us to him in the 5th.
I think the OL draft was by design and it deserves high marks and praise. I think the DL draft was more a matter of what was available at our draft spots, and while not necessarily a bad thing, I think missing out on all of the good prospects at CB is going to haunt us down the line. And next year if a value 34 DE falls to us, we'll draft another position because we're set at DE. Frankly, I'd rather one of those guys had been a NT at least.