2010 Free Agency Will Be Limited | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

2010 Free Agency Will Be Limited

So Be

Active Roster
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
16,572
Reaction score
2,216
Here's some early indications of what's ahead.

A general manager told me that the projections for players scheduled to be free agents -- if it were a capped year -- could be upwards of 170 fewer players if it is uncapped. Every player from the 2005 draft who signed a five-year contract and every player who signed a four-year deal in 2006 would miss out on eligibility for free agency and revert back to their club as a restricted free agent. Keep in mind, teams target this group over all others when it comes to spending the big money in free agency.

Uncapped years limit free agency

Now that NFL owners have voted unanimously to end their agreement with the players' union in 2011, they still have all of 2008 and 2009 to negotiate a new CBA before the "trigger" points that are in place to encourage negotiations would fire and things wouldn't be as we know them today.

The one factor fans have heard the most about is that 2010 and 2011 would be "uncapped" years. But there are three main trigger points that will go off in 2010 if there isn't a new CBA in place, and they may offset the fear of life with no salary cap. More ... On the surface it might appear that the older veterans would get the windfall with their younger competitors off the market, but this group will take a hit because teams will have three tags instead of one to restrict true veterans from being entirely free. Another general manager projects that this mechanism will lock up 30 players. As you can see, 200 players would be off the market.

There could still be a few choice players left to test free agency and a number of solid players on bad teams will be looking to go to contending teams. A team such as the Patriots has always done a great job in free agency, getting very good veterans on reasonable deals because a player wants a chance at a Super Bowl ring. Well, there will be a "Final 8" rule in 2010.

The rule will restrict the final eight teams in the playoffs from signing free agents. The final four teams shall not be permitted to negotiate and sign any unrestricted free agent to a player contract except for players who acquired their status by being cut or were on the final four team when their contract expired. Playoff teams five thru eight get a break to sign one player with a salary of $4,925,000 or more and any number of players with a first-year salary of no more than $3,275,000 and an annual increase of no more than 30 percent in the following years.

There is a mechanism to permit the final eight teams to sign an unrestricted free agent for each one of their own unrestricted free agents who sign with another club as long as they don't spend more than what their own lost player received from his new club.

For all practical purposes, free agency will not have any teeth in 2010 and close to 200 players hoping to hit a big pay day will have to wait at least a year and risk injury.
_________________
WHEN MEN ARE MOST SURE AND ARROGANT, THEY ARE MOST LIKELY MISTAKEN.
 
Tthe upper level FA's are not going to be there. The price on those who slip through is going to be THROUGH THE ROOF.

Before doing some research, I was thinking 2010 would be the year we would go out and spend on a high priced missing piece or two. I believed we could cut or trade any players we wanted, regardless of contract, because there was no worries of a cap hit. Players like J Allen, Porter, Ginn, and even the one's signed this year were no longer safe.

Now, I have to totally re-think that. I believe we are going to see more trades than in any time in NFL history. It appears to be the only way teams are going to be able to acquire upper level players.

In addition, I believe those players are going to bring a premium price from teams taking a shot at a Super Bowl before a potential lock out, and the potential ending of the draft in 2011. It has the makings of a CRAZY OFF SEASON.

The above article was from NFL.COM. USA and CBS said the same.
 
The only benefit will be the ability to dump high priced busts without any ramifications.
 
Depends...if Culver or Clemmons develop into a decent starter, you can get rid of eithe Bell or Wilson.

I asnt necissarily talking about the dolphins, I mean teams in general.
 
id dump them both with camrillo and justin smiley all over paid
 
Back
Top Bottom