2010 Uncapped Season | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

2010 Uncapped Season

PorrotheDolfan

Die Hard Fan
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
567
Reaction score
10
If 2010 does become an uncapped season this means there is no salary cap, correct?

If that's the case who's the richest team in the NFL?

I was thinking about this team and there is no doubt in my mind Miami is the richest team, with Ross being one of the richest owners, and with the addition of all the minority owners, and the profit we will make from the Super Bowl and Pro Bowl being played in Land Shark Stadium, not to mention the money we make from the Hurricanes and Marlins using our Stadium, but the key is the minority owners, Is this a brilliant idea of Ross to have more money available for this uncapped season?
 
i mentioned this earlier in the season thinking thats why we possibly started getting the cleb. owners for money. pretty much everyone shot me down and they had good reasoning i cant recall what it was maybe someone else can chime in on this?
 
Not going to happen... never will...

I dont know why every one thinks it will happen. Everyone knows it will ruin football, even the owners.
 
No salary cap will destroy football and make it the awful mess that baseball is.
 
Paul Allen co founder of microsoft and Seahawk owner is
said to be worth 16-20 BILLION dollars...#1 in the NFL

Ross is worth around 4.5 BILLION dollars...#2 in the NFL
 
Paul Allen co founder of microsoft and Seahawk owner is
said to be worth 16-20 BILLION dollars...#1 in the NFL

Ross is worth around 4.5 BILLION dollars...#2 in the NFL

Not saying i dont believe you...but can you tell me where you found this I would love to see a list and read about that
 
Free Agency: What will it be?

clear.gif

With the owners having opted out of the current Collective Bargaining Agreement set to expire in 2010, there could be some dramatic changes reshaping the NFL the way we know it. If a new CBA isn’t agreed upon by March of 2010, the NFL’s salary cap will vanish. Fans: Don’t fret; it may not be quite as bad as you imagine. Like most people, I would like to see the two sides get a deal ironed out, but here are a number of changes that will fall into place, preventing the deep pockets of Daniel Snyder and Jerry Jones buying themselves a Championship.


Players must accrue SIX seasons. Currently, players must accrue only four seasons before they can enter the market as an unrestricted free agent. So what is the change? Players will have to accrue six full seasons before having the ability to enter unrestricted free agency. For example, many players drafted in the second round or later in the 2006 draft are scheduled to be unrestricted free agents under a 2010 capped season, having signed four-year rookie deals. If a new CBA is not agreed upon and the 2010 season becomes uncapped, free agents-to-be such as Marcus McNeill, DeMeco Ryans, and Thomas Howard, will not have accrued six seasons and will therefore qualify as Restricted Free Agents. The Restricted Free Agents pool will consist of all players who have accrued three, four, or five years and have expiring contracts


Two tags.
Under the current CBA, teams have one franchise tag OR one transition tag to apply on one of their free agents-to-be while paying them at an elite level. Under the conditions set forth, a 2010 uncapped year would lead to an extra transition tag being available. So, teams would be able to retain their top two unrestricted players with either two transition tags, or one franchise tag and one transition tag. This would make it all the more difficult for players to reach unrestricted free agency.


Restrictions on playoff teams. The eight teams that make the divisional playoffs will have restrictions placed upon them in unrestricted free agency. They will be able to only sign free agents in accordance to the number of players they lose. The four teams that lose in the Divisional rounds will have some additional flexibility. They may sign one player with a salary of $4.925 million or higher, as well as any number of free agents with a first year salary under $3.275 million and an increase of no more than 30 percent in the subsequent years. This will prevent the competitive teams from dominating the open market year in and year out.

There are obvious rules put in place to keep the NFL competitive even with an uncapped season and future. However, where there is money, there are always people finding loopholes; the NFL is no different. You can bet the rich owners will find ways to manipulate the rules, but the league should stay far more competitive than some are envisioning. The owners and the players will also have an incentive to agree upon a new deal because an uncapped future could be detrimental to members on both sides.

http://footballsfuture.com/2010/fa/opt.html
 
I agree that an uncapped season would ruin football in the NFL, but that doesn't mean it's not gonna happen, and I'm just saying if it does happen Miami has put themselves in a great position to make something out of this situation
 
There are more restrictions then you can imagine if it's a uncapped year. You would have to hope we lose a bunch of games because it's easier to sign more FA's with a bad record then a playoff team. I don't know all the details but basically if you a good team your very limited in the moves you can do. The biggest plus is the ability to cut crappy contracts without penalty, I have a tough time believing both parties will let it get this far.
 
Free Agency: What will it be?

clear.gif

With the owners having opted out of the current Collective Bargaining Agreement set to expire in 2010, there could be some dramatic changes reshaping the NFL the way we know it. If a new CBA isn’t agreed upon by March of 2010, the NFL’s salary cap will vanish. Fans: Don’t fret; it may not be quite as bad as you imagine. Like most people, I would like to see the two sides get a deal ironed out, but here are a number of changes that will fall into place, preventing the deep pockets of Daniel Snyder and Jerry Jones buying themselves a Championship.


Players must accrue SIX seasons. Currently, players must accrue only four seasons before they can enter the market as an unrestricted free agent. So what is the change? Players will have to accrue six full seasons before having the ability to enter unrestricted free agency. For example, many players drafted in the second round or later in the 2006 draft are scheduled to be unrestricted free agents under a 2010 capped season, having signed four-year rookie deals. If a new CBA is not agreed upon and the 2010 season becomes uncapped, free agents-to-be such as Marcus McNeill, DeMeco Ryans, and Thomas Howard, will not have accrued six seasons and will therefore qualify as Restricted Free Agents. The Restricted Free Agents pool will consist of all players who have accrued three, four, or five years and have expiring contracts


Two tags. Under the current CBA, teams have one franchise tag OR one transition tag to apply on one of their free agents-to-be while paying them at an elite level. Under the conditions set forth, a 2010 uncapped year would lead to an extra transition tag being available. So, teams would be able to retain their top two unrestricted players with either two transition tags, or one franchise tag and one transition tag. This would make it all the more difficult for players to reach unrestricted free agency.


Restrictions on playoff teams. The eight teams that make the divisional playoffs will have restrictions placed upon them in unrestricted free agency. They will be able to only sign free agents in accordance to the number of players they lose. The four teams that lose in the Divisional rounds will have some additional flexibility. They may sign one player with a salary of $4.925 million or higher, as well as any number of free agents with a first year salary under $3.275 million and an increase of no more than 30 percent in the subsequent years. This will prevent the competitive teams from dominating the open market year in and year out.

There are obvious rules put in place to keep the NFL competitive even with an uncapped season and future. However, where there is money, there are always people finding loopholes; the NFL is no different. You can bet the rich owners will find ways to manipulate the rules, but the league should stay far more competitive than some are envisioning. The owners and the players will also have an incentive to agree upon a new deal because an uncapped future could be detrimental to members on both sides.

http://footballsfuture.com/2010/fa/opt.html
damn homie you just dropped some serious knowledge so in other words no instant gratifaction from this deAL?
 
I'm here to enlighten...

;)

and to smash things

:rimshot:
 
heres a list of the richest owners as of 2008. funny both Ross and Huizenga (who i believe now owns like 5% of the team) are on the list. Besides the seahawks who would benefit most from no salary cap, we are the 2nd best team to do so. Add in the minority owners with their millions or billions we potentially would be in the best position to benefit from no cap due to our great FO.

http://www.endzonebuzz.com/50226711/richest_owners_or_who_has_to_spend_if_nfl_goes_uncapped.php
 
I just hope for 1s Roger does something right and gets a deal done with the PA. I also hope they fix the mess that the rookie salaries are and start awarding players that deserve it then a bunch of 21-23 year old kids.
 
I think the owners are really leaning towards an uncapped year. With no salary cap there is also no salary floor. Small market teams like the Bucs or Jaguars could field a team for a very low salary and just rake in the money from the NFL.

Players don't realize, very few will get the big bucks they desire, while in reality, most will get paid peanuts by a lot of teams.
 
Back
Top Bottom