Sturgis deserves some blame, but I can't figure out why, when you're winning with time of possession and running the ball, you call two straight pass plays on 2nd and 2 and 3rd and 2. What happened to your philosophy, to your gameplan? You got Tom Brady over there on the bench, a quieted enemy stadium, and you find a way to breathe life back into them all, rather than going up three scores.I give 0% credit to those statistical odds projections in football games, especially against Tom Brady and the Pats (and the refs) in their house. I get it you're content to just go for a FG and go up 17 early in the 3rd quarter and think that's enough to beat New England. Not me, I'd much rather try and go up 21.
But you're still not addressing the FACT that a 46 yard FG is VERY makeable. Where's the blame on Sturgis? I mean Tannehill AND Sherman did give him a shot at a FG that any FG kicker in the league should be able to make.
Make them win the game! Don't give it to them!