32 for 47, 2TD's 1INT 353 yds 95.43 QB Rating | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

32 for 47, 2TD's 1INT 353 yds 95.43 QB Rating

K

Kenny_Stang

FinHeaven VIP
Joined
Dec 1, 2003
Messages
1,663
Reaction score
0
Age
45
Location
Fort Worth
32 for 47, 2TD's 1INT 353 yds 95.43 QB Rating

Those are our combined QB stats for the game... if anyone had asked me before the game if I would take those stats, I and everyone else on here, would have taken them in a heartbeat. If you remove the Interception at the end that would have left us with a combined QB Rating of 104.3.

Here's a breakdown of each QB's stats

A.J. Feeley
4 for 7 0 TD's, 0 INT 35 57% completion and 70.5 QB Rating
(had DT caught his pass the comp goes to 71.4% and QB rating to 94.3)

Gus Frerotte
11 for 17 1 TD, 0 INT 143 64% completion and 110.6 QB rating

Sage Rosenfels
6 for 9 1 TD, 0 INT 58 66% completion and 121.5 QB Rating

Brock Berlin
11 for 14 0 TD, 1 INT 117 78% completion and 71.7 QB Rating
(Had he not thrown the Interception he would have had a 101.5 QB Rating)

So ponder and discuss... from those stats the QB position doesn't look too bad now does it? :confused:
 
but half of the stats came with the Bears first team out of the game
 
For comparison the Bears were:

22 for 41 1 TD, 1 INT for 376 yards 53.7% and 83 QB Rating.
 
I thought Brock Berlin's completion percentage was especially impressive, given the fact that he hasn't gotten a whole lot of chances in practice and when he has, he's turfed a heck of a lot of balls.

He threw a bad pick at the end. Big deal. It was preseason and he's a rookie playing in his first big leagues game...he got victimized doing something he'll learn you can't do in the pros, be predictable. It still took a heck of a lot to get that team down into that redzone in position to throw that pick.

And if you don't think it pains me to praise Brock Berlin after the career he had at my beloved University of Miami, think again.
 
nick1 said:
but half of the stats came with the Bears first team out of the game
Click to expand...

So did the Bears, Grossman was 5 for 12 for 77 yards no TD's and not Int's. The big numbers came against our 2nd and 3rd stringers.
 
nick1 said:
but half of the stats came with the Bears first team out of the game
Click to expand...

What does that matter? Our first team wasn't in the game either. Both teams were equal.
 
no doubt that our offenses as a whole are better then the Bears offenses, mainly because our WR depth and TE depth is much better then theirs
 
Kenny_Stang said:
32 for 47, 2TD's 1INT 353 yds 95.43 QB Rating

Those are our combined QB stats for the game... if anyone had asked me before the game if I would take those stats, I and everyone else on here, would have taken them in a heartbeat. If you remove the Interception at the end that would have left us with a combined QB Rating of 104.3.

Here's a breakdown of each QB's stats

A.J. Feeley
4 for 7 0 TD's, 0 INT 35 57% completion and 70.5 QB Rating
(had DT caught his pass the comp goes to 71.4% and QB rating to 94.3)

Gus Frerotte
11 for 17 1 TD, 0 INT 143 64% completion and 110.6 QB rating

Sage Rosenfels
6 for 9 1 TD, 0 INT 58 66% completion and 121.5 QB Rating

Brock Berlin
11 for 14 0 TD, 1 INT 117 78% completion and 71.7 QB Rating
(Had he not thrown the Interception he would have had a 101.5 QB Rating)

So ponder and discuss... from those stats the QB position doesn't look too bad now does it? :confused:
Click to expand...


I dont think the QB /passing game was much in question. (except the AJ bashers) i thought they all looked great.


It was the O-Line.. 1.9 yds per carry 42 yds total. 2 sacks and the secondary allowing over 375 yds to the Chicago Bears under a new offensive system...
 
I just find it very interesting that our overall QB rating and % numbers are better than the Bears. Alot of people are down on the QB position after the game, but the #'s don't bear that out.
 
Unscarred said:
Didn't AJ and Gus both play against first team defenses?
Click to expand...
correct and Gus had a good game, I'm not taking that away from him
 
Here are the things I would take from this game from an offensive standpoint:

1. The pass protection is better than it was a year ago, allowing more time to throw.

2. The offensive scheme isn't overwhelmingly different, but the average pass attempt distance has probably gone from about 12 yards to about 15 or 16 yards.

3. The offensive line still has a long way to go before they develop run-blocking ability.

4. Teams that dare us to throw it this year will see us throwing it, and see us succeeding.
 
nick1 said:
correct and Gus had a good game, I'm not taking that away from him
Click to expand...
AJ didn't? I thought AJ played as well as Gus. AJ didn't seem to have the awareness that Gus had but still made some pretty good throws.
 
ckparrothead said:
Here are the things I would take from this game from an offensive standpoint:

1. The pass protection is better than it was a year ago, allowing more time to throw.

2. The offensive scheme isn't overwhelmingly different, but the average pass attempt distance has probably gone from about 12 yards to about 15 or 16 yards.

3. The offensive line still has a long way to go before they develop run-blocking ability.

4. Teams that dare us to throw it this year will see us throwing it, and see us succeeding.
Click to expand...


Agreed..well said.;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom