Right. There's a number of us who are not 100% sold on Rosen. But wait! There's more you could present the most "neutral" opinion/evaluation based on the pros and cons & just let the reader/viewer/pod caster ultimately fill in the blanks in terms of formulating their "very own conclusion!" For example -- I saw a video on Rosen where a dude who apparently was familiar with him back in college was really concerned about the hitch he had developed in AZ. I went back and watched more AZ stuff and sure enough that hitch (deadly problem @NFL level IMO) was there. As an inquiring mind I would certainly dig more in-depth crit as well as promo on Rosen by folks who readily pay attention to such "nuance" and in certain terms even the more obvious -- as long as there's some info that penetrates beyond the veneer -- and it's being presented sans agenda. For me -- that's a winner with any/all players as a formula for info. So... Perhaps and maybe -- don't worry about those who (for whatever reason) won't agree with your "cons" but just produce the best, most unbiased (honest) product you can while keeping in mind (perspective) you're talking to a "Dolphins audience." I'm down with all of that and available as a ad hoc producer (ad hoc comp negotiable)! Beyond that. I'm a certified Luddite because I don't do twitter.