Look at these stats:
First 3 games
vs. NE: 18 for 32, 178 yds, 2 TDs, 1 INT, 3 carries for -2 yds.
at Buf: 31 for 49, 241 yds, 1 TD, 1 INT, 4 carries for 11 yds.
vs. KC: 21 for 43, 205 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT, 1 carry for 9 yds.
Now the last 3. Note the difference in rushing.
at Oak: 23 for 31, 278 yds, 2 TDs, 1 INT, 5 carries for 35 yds.
vs. GB: 20 for 31, 244 yds, 2 TDs, 2 INTs, 3 carries for 49 yds.
at Chi: 25 for 32, 277 yds, 2 TDs, 0 INT, 6 carries for 48 yds (2 yds negated b/c he kneeled to run out the clock).
8 carries for 18 yds in the first 3 games. 14 carries for 132 yds the last 3 games. He threw 124 passes in those first 3 games and only 94 the last 3. This has to be the key to success for Tannehill and the offense. Versus Oakland and today against Chicago it seemed as if Lazor pulled out different plays from the playbook that we haven't seen all year. I didn't see those vs. Green Bay or the other games where Miami lost.
First 3 games
vs. NE: 18 for 32, 178 yds, 2 TDs, 1 INT, 3 carries for -2 yds.
at Buf: 31 for 49, 241 yds, 1 TD, 1 INT, 4 carries for 11 yds.
vs. KC: 21 for 43, 205 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT, 1 carry for 9 yds.
Now the last 3. Note the difference in rushing.
at Oak: 23 for 31, 278 yds, 2 TDs, 1 INT, 5 carries for 35 yds.
vs. GB: 20 for 31, 244 yds, 2 TDs, 2 INTs, 3 carries for 49 yds.
at Chi: 25 for 32, 277 yds, 2 TDs, 0 INT, 6 carries for 48 yds (2 yds negated b/c he kneeled to run out the clock).
8 carries for 18 yds in the first 3 games. 14 carries for 132 yds the last 3 games. He threw 124 passes in those first 3 games and only 94 the last 3. This has to be the key to success for Tannehill and the offense. Versus Oakland and today against Chicago it seemed as if Lazor pulled out different plays from the playbook that we haven't seen all year. I didn't see those vs. Green Bay or the other games where Miami lost.