A Leader of men, motivator and an inovator. | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

A Leader of men, motivator and an inovator.

mnphinfan

Lifelong Fin Fan
Club Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Messages
4,586
Reaction score
2,715
Location
Mahtomedi MN
The laundry list of coaches the Fins have trudged out the past 20 years has been to say the least, unimpressive. Most of them had at least one of the traits I list, but not one of them had all of them.

Jimmy lost his ability to lead and motivate when he came to Miami and would have rather spent his time fishing.

Wanny wasn't a leader nor an innovator.

Cameron was none of the above.

Saban was a motivator and innovator but was definitely not a leader of men as the locker room pretty quickly grew tired of his tyrannical philosophy.

Sparano was a good motivator at the beginning but had no idea how to lead or innovate.

Philbin I fear is a leader of men but not a motivator or an innovator. I say this for two reasons. His teams just seem to come out flat all to often, both at the beginning of games and to start the second half. He had an amazing chance this past week to motivate his team with an "us vs. the world" philosophy that by all accounts was low hanging fruit and still the team played like the little sisters of the poor for the first half. I also see now that he is not an innovator as the offensive philosophy has grown stagnant. Yes, I know the offensive line has been horrible, but I need to see better game planning. I need to see receivers switching where the line up pre-snap. I need to see Wallace put in motion where he has the ability to get a free release off of the LOS as well as take advantage of slower players in coverage. I need to see more screen passes on passing downs because the o-line can't hold a block for more than 3 seconds. On the defensive side of the ball I need to see better usage of our playmakers. Wake, if healthy should never be on the bench for the likes of Shelby. Jordan should also never be on the sideline when players like Trunsik and Spitler are in the game. The play where I knew Coyle needed to be replaced on Monday was when Trunsik was playing OLB and dropped back into pass coverage on either a 2nd or 3rd and long. Trunsik's assignment in the play was to cover the shallow flat. On this play Turnsik is late in noticing the RB had slipped into the flat, late in getting to the RB after the catch, then he misses the tackle which allows the RB to convert the 1st down. Wasn't one of Jordan's biggest strengths in college playing zone coverage in the flat? This type of D call was exactly suited to his strength and yet there he was on the bench. Don't even get me started on him not being in on every obvious passing down. Then just two days ago Coyle comes out and says the plan is still to use Jordan sparingly for the rest of the season, WTF! Get your damn playmakers in the game!

This coaching staff, on both sides of the ball just seems to have uncanny ability in putting players in position where they are doomed to fail. That is without even taking into consideration their philosophy of playing older, less talented veterans, over younger ones with more athletic ability. If a mistake is going to be made on the field it would be nice if was at least done by a rookie who is learning on the job, vs. an aging veteran who doesn't possess the athletic prowess to even be in position to make a play.

Last, there was a short clip of Philbin staring onto the field in disbelief about what was happening late in the game. (I deleted the game so I no longer have it on DVR.) The look on his face was that of a man who had no answers for what was going on. Unfortunately I had seen that face before on both Cameron and Sparano his last year coaching the fins. That face told me all I needed to know about Philbin. It was the look of a defeated man. Can he get back up from this one, I don't know, but I do know, after seeing that face, I am definitely leaning towards the belief that everyone in terms of the FO and coaching staff probably needs to be replaced.

Hopefully Ross, with the help of his new "Leadership Council" is able to find a new FO and coaching staff with all three traits listed above.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You might be describing Ray Horton.
Or Darrel Bevell (sp?). I can't wait to see what he does in Seattle once he gets Harvin back. I just read an article on him stating he was the main reason they drafted Wilson and traded for Harvin. He used Harvin as a master of all trades in Minnesota. Just found a mismatch for him against every team. I'd love to see what he could do with Tanny, Wallace, Hartline, Gibsom, Miller and Clay. Plus most people don't know he was the starting QB at Wisconsin for 4 years where he led them to their first Rose Bowl victory in 40+ years. This shows me he has the experience to relate to a QB and more than likely would be able to help them grow. As of now he would probably be my #1 choice to replace Philbin.
 
Or Darrel Bevell (sp?). I can't wait to see what he does in Seattle once he gets Harvin back. I just read an article on him stating he was the main reason they drafted Wilson and traded for Harvin. He used Harvin as a master of all trades in Minnesota. Just found a mismatch for him against every team. I'd love to see what he could do with Tanny, Wallace, Hartline, Gibsom, Miller and Clay. Plus most people don't know he was the starting QB at Wisconsin for 4 years where he led them to their first Rose Bowl victory in 40+ years. This shows me he has the experience to relate to a QB and more than likely would be able to help them grow. As of now he would probably be my #1 choice to replace Philbin.

Darrel Bevell gives a good initial impression. And he has been successful with a whole slew of QBs. If Shaw isn't available, I like Gruden, Gruden or Bevell. I would like Ray Horton too, but I think this team needs an offensive guy to develop Tannehill.
 
I'm already sick of reading "leader of men." It's the new "seam threat" or "cornfed" around these parts.
 
Darrel Bevell gives a good initial impression. And he has been successful with a whole slew of QBs. If Shaw isn't available, I like Gruden, Gruden or Bevell. I would like Ray Horton too, but I think this team needs an offensive guy to develop Tannehill.

It honestly doesn't matter which side of the ball a head coach is based in. What is of utmost importance is that they are someone whom the players trust and have a rapport with. And that they aren't completely inept when it comes to in-game management decisions. As long as the HC is capable of hiring a competent staff, I couldn't care less if they are offensive, defensive, or even a God damn special teams coach.
 
My hunch is that Philbin stays. It's not what you want to hear but he's a classy, intelligent, well organized guy and Ross clearly likes him.
I also saw the Trusnik feeble attempt to tackle and decided at that moment, he should be gone (only possible excuse, injured). It will be interesting if anything happens. Belichick would have dragged him off the ground and fired him on the spot, regardless of his special teams skills.
 
Philbin I fear is a leader of men but not a motivator or an innovator.

I don't see a leader, sorry. But you're right on the non-innovator part. Anyone who turns their offense over to Mike Sherman is not looking to innovate.

What is Philbin attempting to bring to the team? Well, this was one report when he was hired:

"His offense also places a heavy emphasis on tight end. Expect Charles Clay and a tight end drafted by Miami to get plenty of touches, while also seeing Brandon Marshall (if he stays in Miami) get open more easily down the field. Reggie Bush will also get plenty of opportunities to catch passes out of the backfield and in a West Coast offense finds himself in an offense that can take advantage of all of his talents."

Top tight ends were drafted by other teams, not Miami. We did pick up Keller, but filling a critical position with a FA is always a risk, and Keller came with an injury history. Freak injury, though, and not anticipated. Still, I was surprised we didn't focus on the draft with offense. Clay HAS been a factor, as anticipated. But that hasn't been enough, clearly, and there is currently no emphasis on TE that I can see. Marshall was replaced by Wallace, not a bad move, but coaches (and QB) failed in getting him involved early enough. He's also not exactly a good fit for the scheme. Reggie Bush did not get more opportunities, and was out of favor by the coaches, and eventually cut. He's lighting it up on another team right now.

So what we're seeing right now, is not what anyone anticipated we would see. The only thing this regime seems to have accomplished is creating a productive passing game, where we didn't have one before.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
yeah its called "the officials screwjob". Thats the lost look.

And alot of teams start off slow at times. Seattle comes to mind when they were down 21-0 to Tampa. The Patriots have a long history of starting out games like that. Which is why BB's big talk is called the "horserace".
 
Such a tragic downfall for our HC position considering we had the most perfect head coach anyone could ever want in Shula. Since then the only two who had any business being HC's in this league were JJ and Saban. They both failed due to immense, out of control egos.
 
I think Saban would have eventually been successful. He started slow but the team got on some good win streaks - just too late. He would have figured it out. Philbin just looks like a doofus. I don't see the players relating to him.
 
Back
Top Bottom