I just think it's dumb that he's the guy on the cover. I wonder just how many players turned them down to actully dig that far down to the botttom of the barrell to pull out Young. His 12 TDs, 13 INTs 55 comp % and 69.2 rating doesn't strike me as star.
Anyone else think the Titans success could've had something to do with Travis Henry, Keith Bullock and Pacman Jones?
"Member of the Vince Young was overrated in 2006 bandwagon."
ok and those players were on the team and playing when they had 0 wins before vince became the starter... then vince becomes the starter and they go 8-5...
of course those players had an impact, but to think vince had none is ******ed... just watch him play, dont look at a box score and think you know everything about a player... and it was also his first year...
now Matt Leinart, with clearly more talent around him did as follows...
11 games started (4-7 Record)
Passing: 56.8% 2547 yds 11 tds 12 ints
Rushing: 49 yds 2 tds 2 fumbles lost
Totals: 2596 yards total, 13 TDs, 14 Turnovers
Vince Young
13 games started (8-5 Record)
Passing: 51.5% 2199 yds 12 tds 13 ints
Rushing: 552 yds 7 tds 3 fumbles lost
Totals: 2751 yards total, 19 TDs 16 Turnovers
was Leinart really that much better? especially on a team with so much more offensive talent?
dont forget this was youngs first year... i always hate sounding like a huge VY fan, but i cant understand why people bad mouth him for no reason... its really crazy, just watch the games and you'll see the impact he has...