Didn't I see you with figures similar to the 30% First Round success for QBs and 3% in the later rounds? If that analysis holds statistically true, then those who want to gamble on later round QB's are willing to spend (statistically) between 5-20 years (optimistically), with an long term loose approximation (assuming at least 1.5 years per datum with a failure rate on average of 97%) of 45 or more, years to find the Next Great Quarterback, hoping that the die turns up in their favor early.
That makes no sense to me, either athletically, statistically, or financially - unless one wishes that the team tanks two years in a row, and maybe, just maybe, next years crop will have a winner we can reach with a first round draft pick. That being said, if either one of the two QB's are there, it would be obvious that long term we have to take the shot on the one at the #2 spot. My preference right now is Rodgers because of the accuracy figures I have seen (and at least one comparision with Joe Montana), but either one, with a couple of years tutelage, could be special, if not possibly great quarterbacks.