according to the draft value chart... | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

according to the draft value chart...

interesting, not thinking its going to happen, i like the find though
 
Not all the teams follow the chart though.
 
Cant see that happening, but good to know, I was wondering what the value chart said.
 
if we hired JJ as a consultant could we trade down until we owned every 2nd day pick?
 
I think Santonio Holmes or Chad Jackson would look good in a Dolphins uniform. We need a couple of receivers.
 
Yeah thats not really gunna happen. Seattle is a very cheap team and loves to save money and the best way to do that is to have good rookies. I don't see them trading or anyone that is in real cap trouble.
 
fishbanger said:
I think Santonio Holmes or Chad Jackson would look good in a Dolphins uniform. We need a couple of receivers.
Click to expand...


If we had a 2nd round pick I might have thought that this was ok to take BPA, But we really need help in the secondary.
 
Teams have different value charts it depends on who your trading with.
 
This trade was done 2 years ago (#16-#31)

In the 2004 draft the 49ers traded the 16th pick in the draft for the eagles 1st rounder (#31) and second rounder (#58). Notice the Eagles did not give up their 3rd round pick.
 
ChambersNBoston said:
http://www.nfldraftblitz.com/pick_value_chart.htm

we can trade our first pick with the seahawks for their 1st #31, 2nd #63, and 3rd # 95 ...reason why they would trade is to get a premium WR like Santonio or Chad.

check it out alot of trade down scenarios that you can think of
Click to expand...
Do it! Then take Nick Mangold or Ko Simpson. Either would fill a need and be an upgrade.
 
ChambersNBoston said:
http://www.nfldraftblitz.com/pick_value_chart.htm

we can trade our first pick with the seahawks for their 1st #31, 2nd #63, and 3rd # 95 ...reason why they would trade is to get a premium WR like Santonio or Chad.

check it out alot of trade down scenarios that you can think of
Click to expand...

If that happens, are draft would be:

1
2
3a
3b
4
7
7
7

:drools:
 
If you look at that chart, we could have Indi 1st (30) and second (62) for our 1st (16).... why? because they want a stud RB and they will be gone by then and available by the 16. We would get back a 2nd round draft pick. At 30st Nick Mangold (top C in the draft) would be a very good pick.

I think that makes a lot of sense !!!! What do you think?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom