AI's Toughest Player Miami Dolphins 7 Round Mock | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

AI's Toughest Player Miami Dolphins 7 Round Mock

Fin-Loco

Super Donator
Club Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2003
Messages
29,540
Reaction score
98,859
Location
Margaritaville
EDITED TO MAKE REVISIONS VOICED. LET'S SEE HOW IT DOES NOW.
I asked Grok for a 7-round mock draft for our Miami Dolphins, focusing on our needs and demanding players who’d crawl through broken glass—grinders with elite toughness, film study, and leadership. With Raheem Mostert now gone, our RB room is thinner, relying on De’Von Achane and Jaylen Wright. This revised mock fixes errors about Kelvin Banks Jr., Jahdae Barron, Carson Schwesinger, and the punter signing, and explains why Cam Skattebo, the draft’s toughest player, still didn’t make the cut despite the RB need. Let’s see if this builds a physical, AFC East-ready roster.

Methodology
  • Availability Check: Players are picked using 2025 NFL Draft big boards (PFF, NFL Draft Buzz, ESPN, The Athletic), with rankings matching pick ranges (e.g., Pick 13: ~10-20; Round 7: 200+ or UDFA), verified via NFL Mock Draft Database and April 2025 mocks.
  • Toughness Criteria: We want players with proven physicality, work ethic, and leadership—extra film study, playing through pain, finishing plays. Scouting reports (PFF, NFL Draft Buzz, ESPN) and coach quotes confirm high-motor traits.
  • Team Fit: Picks target Miami’s 2024 roster needs (per ESPN, PFF): guard (post-Robert Hunt), cornerback (post-Kendall Fuller), safety (post-Jevon Holland), defensive tackle (post-Calais Campbell), and TE2 (behind Jonnu Smith). Edge and linebacker depth adds physicality around Tua Tagovailoa. With a punter signed, we focus on safety and edge. Running back depth is now a consideration with Mostert gone, but Achane and Wright remain the core, so RB isn’t a top priority.
  • Sources: Rankings and toughness come from PFF’s 2025 big board, NFL Draft Buzz, The Athletic, ESPN, Senior Bowl reports, Yahoo Sports, and Bleacher Report, backed by film analysis and coach testimonials.

Revised 7-Round Mock Draft
Round 1, Pick 13: JAHDAE BARRON, CB, TEXAS
Correction: KELVIN BANKS JR. HAS NOT PLAYED GUARD AND IS PROJECTED AS A TACKLE. The original mock listed Banks as a guard with 34 starts—wrong. Banks, a Texas OT, has 42 starts at left tackle, no guard experience (PFF, NFL Draft Buzz). He’s a top-10 tackle prospect, often gone by 13 (Daniel Jeremiah, USA TODAY). We need a guard, not a tackle, with Patrick Paul developing behind Terron Armstead (maybe retiring post-2025).
Why Barron? Barron’s a first-round stud (15-25, PFF, Mel Kiper), ideal at 13. His 2024 stats (47 tackles, 4 INTs, 90.7 PFF coverage grade) show playmaking, but his slot/outside physicality is key. Post-Kendall Fuller, we need a CB2 for Jalen Ramsey.
  • Toughness Factor: Barron’s 8.2% missed tackle rate and “dog mentality” (The Athletic) shine. A captain, he dominates press coverage and sets the tone.
  • Team Fit: Our secondary struggled in 2024 (24th, 238.6 yds/g). Kohou’s slot-bound, and Cam Smith/Ethan Bonner aren’t ready. Barron’s versatility fits Anthony Weaver’s aggressive scheme.
  • Availability: Barron’s 15-25 range (65% of mocks, NFL.com, PFF) fits 13, with top tackles and QBs (Shedeur Sanders) gone.
Round 2, Pick 48: TYLER BOOKER, OG, ALABAMA
Correction: JAHDAE BARRON IS A FIRST-ROUND PROSPECT, NOT ROUND 3. Barron was mocked at 98—mistake. His first-round stock moved him to 13, shifting Xavier Watts (safety) to Round 3 to grab a guard, our top need post-Robert Hunt.
Why Booker? Booker (15-20, PFF, NFL Draft Buzz) is a steal at 48 due to a deep CB/DT class. His 2024 stats (80.7 PFF run-blocking, no sacks allowed) and wrestling background make him a mauler for our weak O-line (28th pass block win rate).
  • Toughness Factor: ESPN’s “nasty streak” fits—Booker pancakes defenders, finishes blocks, and lives in the film room. As Alabama’s line anchor, he’s a leader.
  • Team Fit: Liam Eichenberg (55.5 PFF grade) and Robert Jones (51.8 pass-blocking) let Tua get sacked 34 times. Booker starts at guard, pairs with James Daniels, and boosts Achane/Wright’s run game.
  • Availability: Booker’s top-20 rank fits 48, sliding due to tackle-heavy boards (NFL.com).
Round 3, Pick 98: XAVIER WATTS, S, NOTRE DAME
Why Watts? Watts (45-60, PFF) slides to 98 after prioritizing guard. His 2024 stats (52 tackles, 4 INTs) are solid, but his hard-hitting style shines. Post-Jevon Holland, he battles Ifeatu Melifonwu for safety.
  • Toughness Factor: Watts hits like a linebacker (10.5% missed tackle rate), obsesses over film, and rallies Notre Dame’s defense (PFF). Pure grit.
  • Team Fit: Our safeties lack physicality with Poyer (33) aging. The secondary allowed 6.8 yds/attempt (22nd). Watts’ box/deep versatility fits Weaver’s scheme.
  • Availability: Watts’ 40-60 range aligns with 98, with top safeties (Malaki Starks) gone.
Round 4 Pick 116: C.J. West, DT, Indiana here.
  • Toughness Factor: West’s high-effort play (80.5 PFF run-defense grade) and diving tackles show relentless motor, outworking blockers.
  • Team Fit: Miami’s D-line (20th, 128.4 yds/g) needs depth due to Calais Campbell's departure. West’s run-stopping complements Sieler’s pass rush.
  • Availability: West’s 100-150 range fits 116 (PFF, The Athletic).
Does this address your question about “Jalen Dennis”? Want me to adjust the mock further or dig into another prospect?
Round 4, Pick 135: ORONDE GADSDEN II, TE, SYRACUSE
Why Gadsden? Gadsden (130-150, NFL Draft Buzz) is a TE2 behind Jonnu Smith. His 2024 stats (45 catches, 600 yds) were limited by Syracuse’s QB, but his catches and blocking pop.
  • Toughness Factor: Gadsden’s physicality and film-study habits make him a grinder. His Dolphins legacy (dad Oronde Gadsden) adds drive.
  • Team Fit: Our TEs (42 receptions) need a pass-catcher. Gadsden’s 6-5, 235-lb frame is a red-zone weapon for Tua.
  • Availability: Gadsden’s 130-150 range fits 135 (PFF, ESPN).
Round 5, Pick 150: CARSON SCHWESINGER, LB, UCLA
Correction: CARSON SCHWESINGER PROJECTED EARLIER THAN ROUND 7. Originally at 224, his 2024 stats (104 tackles, 4.5 sacks) place him at 120-160 (PFF), Rounds 4-5 (The Athletic).
Why Schwesinger? Schwesinger bolsters LB depth behind David Long Jr./Anthony Walker Jr. His play-chasing and special-teams upside shine.
  • Toughness Factor: Schwesinger’s 7.8% missed tackle rate and block-shedding (ESPN) show relentless effort, outworking UCLA’s defense.
  • Team Fit: Our LBs (25th run defense EPA) need depth with Walker on a one-year deal. Schwesinger adds versatility.
  • Availability: His 120-160 range fits 150.
Round 5, Pick 155: JERMIEL ATKINS, G, KENTUCKY
Why Atkins? Atkins (150-170, PFF) adds guard depth. His 2024 stats (80.5 PFF pass-blocking) and run-blocking tenacity stand out.
  • Toughness Factor: Atkins’ aggressive blocking and play-finishing mentality (PFF) make him a grinder.
  • Team Fit: Guard depth is key post-Hunt, with Eichenberg/Jones inconsistent. Atkins offers upside.
  • Availability: His 150-170 range fits 155.
Round 7, Pick 224: GABE HALL, EDGE, BAYLOR
Why Hall? Hall (140-160, NFL Draft Buzz) adds edge depth behind Jaelan Phillips/Bradley Chubb. His 2024 stats (4 sacks, 28 tackles) are modest, but his edge-setting effort shines.
  • Toughness Factor: Hall’s non-stop motor (NFL Draft Buzz) outworks Baylor’s line.
  • Team Fit: Edge depth is needed post-Phillips’ injury. Hall aids run defense.
  • Availability: His Round 6-7 stock fits 224 (ESPN).
Round 7, Pick 231: JALEN CATALON, S, UNLV (CHANGED FROM TORY TAYLOR)
Correction: MIAMI SIGNED A PUNTER, TAYLOR UNNEEDED. Taylor was replaced with Catalon to address safety depth.
Why Catalon? Catalon (220-240, NFL Draft Buzz) adds safety depth. His 2024 stats (48 tackles, 3 INTs) and physicality stand out.
  • Toughness Factor: Catalon’s 9.1% missed tackle rate and film study (NFL Draft Buzz) show grit, playing through past injuries.
  • Team Fit: Safety depth is needed post-Holland with Poyer aging. Catalon’s box-safety role fits Weaver’s scheme.
  • Availability: His 220-240 range fits 231 (PFF).
Round 7, Pick 253: KALIQ BROWN, RB, APPALACHIAN STATE (CHANGED TO ADDRESS RB DEPTH)
Change: WITH MOSTERT GONE, ADDED RB DEPTH. Instead of Ko’o Kia (DT), we draft Kaliq Brown to bolster the RB room behind Achane and Wright, prioritizing a tough, complementary back over additional DT depth, as Sieler/Dennis suffice for now.
Why Brown? Brown (240-260, NFL Draft Buzz) is a late-round gem. His 2024 stats (1,200 yds, 12 TDs, 5.8 yds/carry) show productivity, but his physical running and pass-blocking stand out.
  • Toughness Factor: Brown’s 8.5% broken tackle rate and relentless style (NFL Draft Buzz) make him a grinder, fighting for extra yards and excelling in pass protection.
  • Team Fit: With Mostert gone, Achane (speed) and Wright (developing) need a physical RB3. Brown’s power complements McDaniel’s scheme, adding depth for injury-prone Achane.
  • Availability: Brown’s Round 7/UDFA range fits 253 (PFF, ESPN).

Why Cam Skattebo Was Not Selected
Skattebo’s Toughness:
Skattebo (5-11, 215 lbs) is the draft’s toughest player. In 2024, he ran for 1,664 yards, 19 TDs (6.3 yds/carry), caught 37 passes for 506 yards, 2 TDs, and threw a TD pass (PFF). His 87.9 PFF run grade, 4.1 yds after contact, and 9.2% broken tackle rate show power. Bleacher Report calls him a “human battering ram.” NFL Draft Buzz praises his pass-blocking (80.2 PFF) and kick-returning. ESPN’s Matt Miller notes his “blue-collar mentality,” playing through an ankle injury. Coach Kenny Dillingham calls him “our heart” (Yahoo Sports). His Senior Bowl dominance screams grit.
Why Not Skattebo?
  1. RB Still Not a Top Need: Even with Mostert gone, Achane (1,087 yds, 8.2 yds/carry) and Wright (rookie upside) form a strong duo. ESPN/PFF prioritize guard, CB, safety, DT, TE2 over RB, as O-line (28th pass block win rate) and secondary (24th pass defense) are critical. Brown in Round 7 addresses RB depth without sacrificing early picks.
  2. Draft Value: RBs are devalued; only Ashton Jeanty is a Round 1 prospect (NFL.com). Skattebo (70-100, PFF) goes in Rounds 3-4 (e.g., No. 85 Colts, Bleacher Report). Picks 13/48 hit CB/guard; by 98, he’s gone. Early RB picks would skip bigger needs.
  3. Scheme Mismatch: McDaniel’s outside-zone scheme favors Achane’s 4.32 speed and Wright’s burst. Skattebo’s power style (4.58 40, NFL Draft Buzz) fits gap schemes (Steelers). Brown’s 5.8 yds/carry better aligns with Miami’s speed-based runs.
  4. Toughness Elsewhere: Barron’s “dog mentality,” Booker’s “nasty streak,” Watts’ hits, Dennis’ hustle, and Gadsden’s physicality match Skattebo’s grit at key spots. Brown’s late-round toughness (8.5% broken tackle rate) adds RB depth without losing focus.
  5. Workload Concerns: Skattebo’s 468 touches (2022-24) raise durability flags for his 215-lb frame (Yahoo Sports). Miami prefers less-worn players (Booker, Watts) or late-round RBs like Brown with lighter workloads.
  6. Availability: Skattebo’s Round 3-4 projection (e.g., No. 92 Eagles, PFF) means he’s gone by 98. Trading up sacrifices depth for guard, DT, or safety. Brown’s availability at 253 fits better.
Alternative: Skattebo could be targeted in Round 4 (116/135) via trade-up, but this skips DT/TE needs. Achane/Wright, plus Brown’s late-round value, make Skattebo less essential.

Discussion
This mock delivers your “broken glass” vision with tough, film-obsessed leaders. Strengths:
  • Starters: Barron (CB), Booker (G), and Watts (S) are Day 1 impact players, fixing our secondary and O-line.
  • Key Adds: Dennis (DT) and Gadsden (TE2) bring high-motor upside.
  • Depth: Schwesinger (LB), Atkins (G), Hall (EDGE), Catalon (S), and Brown (RB) add physicality, with Brown addressing the RB need post-Mostert.
  • Fit: Picks align with McDaniel’s/Weaver’s schemes, strengthening the trenches, secondary, and now RB depth.
  • Skattebo Omission: Justified by Achane/Wright’s strength, Brown’s late-round fit, and urgent needs (O-line, secondary), though his grit is tempting.
    Concerns: Skattebo’s leadership could’ve been a culture boost, but Brown’s toughness and scheme fit work better late. The focus on guard, CB, and safety is solid, but fans might crave a bigger RB splash. Does this roster have the grit to dominate the AFC East?
 
Last edited:
Interesting. Save it, and see how it looks in 3 years.
 
A bunch of those players aren't going to be there, especially Barron and Schwesinger. They are first and second round prospects. This is why we shouldn't trust LLMs. It just spits out garbage 90% of the time.

I asked Copilot if LLMs are reliable. Below is what it said. I guess it's just like with everything these days, take it with a grain of salt. LOL.
LLMs can be impressively reliable in many situations, but they do have limitations. Their strength lies in their ability to process vast amounts of information, generate coherent responses, and assist with complex tasks. They're great at summarizing, brainstorming, coding, and even understanding nuanced language.


However, they aren't perfect. Since they rely on patterns in data rather than true comprehension, they can sometimes generate incorrect or misleading information. They're also sensitive to biases in their training data, which means their responses might reflect biases present in the material they were trained on. And they don't have real-world awareness or true reasoning—they only predict words based on probability rather than truly "thinking."


So, while LLMs can be a fantastic tool, it's always good to verify important information and use critical thinking when relying on them. What are you hoping to use an LLM for? I can help guide you!
 
Minor comment, we signed Ryan Stonehouse, who got dropped by Titans in cost cutting move, so we’re set at Punter. Bailey will be gone in training camp.

 
I asked Grok to give me a 7 round mock considering our needs. I told it to prioritize apex toughness, film study, and leadership. I wanted the players who would crawl through broken glass to be on this team. Here's what it came up with. Discuss.

Methodology
  • Availability Check: Players are selected based on 2025 NFL Draft big boards (PFF, NFL Draft Buzz, ESPN, The Athletic), with rankings matching pick ranges (e.g., Pick 13: ~10-20; Round 7: 200+ or UDFA) to ensure realism.
  • Toughness Criteria: Selections prioritize players with documented work ethic, physicality, and leadership (e.g., extra film study, playing through injuries, finishing plays), favoring effort over stats, per your request. Scouting reports highlight those who outwork teammates and play with a high motor.
  • Team Fit: Picks address Miami’s 2024 roster needs (per ESPN, PFF): DT (post-Campbell), G (post-Hunt), S (post-Holland), CB2 (post-Fuller), TE2 (behind Jonnu Smith), and depth at edge and linebacker, building a physical roster around Tua Tagovailoa.
  • Sources: Rankings and toughness traits are sourced from PFF’s 2025 big board, NFL Draft Buzz’s prospect database, The Athletic’s draft guides, and ESPN’s scouting notes, with coach quotes and film analysis confirming work ethic.
Revised 7-Round Mock Draft for Miami Dolphins

Round 1, Pick 13: Kelvin Banks Jr., G, Texas
Why Banks? Banks, a dominant guard with elite toughness, is a plug-and-play starter at left guard for Miami. His 2024 stats (86.5 PFF pass-blocking grade, no sacks allowed in 400+ snaps) show his prowess, but his relentless run-blocking and leadership define him. Ranked 10-15 by PFF and NFL Draft Buzz, he’s a steal at 13. After losing Robert Hunt, Miami needs an immediate guard upgrade, and Banks’ experience (34 starts at guard) ensures he starts Day 1, anchoring the line with James Daniels.
Toughness Factor: A team captain known for outworking Texas’ O-line, Banks plays through the whistle, pancaking defenders and rallying teammates. His “first-in, last-out” practice habits make him a culture-setter.

Round 2, Pick 48: Xavier Watts, S, Notre Dame
Why Watts? Watts, a hard-hitting safety, embodies toughness and is ranked 45-60 by PFF and NFL Draft Buzz, fitting at 48. His 2024 stats (52 tackles, 4 INTs) are solid, but his leadership and pursuit stand out. With Jevon Holland gone, Watts can start immediately, competing with Ifeatu Melifonwu. His versatility (box, deep safety) suits Miami’s secondary.
Toughness Factor: Watts’ linebacker-like hits and film-room obsession earned coach praise. He outworked Notre Dame’s DBs, rallying the defense with his intensity.

Round 3, Pick 98: Jahdae Barron, CB, Texas
Why Barron? Barron, a versatile cornerback ranked 90-100 by NFL Draft Buzz, is ideal for CB2 opposite Jalen Ramsey. His 2024 stats (47 tackles, 4 INTs) are respectable, but his physicality in the slot or outside shines. Post-Kendall Fuller, Miami needs a tenacious CB2, and Barron’s effort fits.
Toughness Factor: Barron’s fearless tackling and practice intensity outshone Texas’ star-studded secondary. He’s a grinder who fights for every snap, per scouting reports.

Round 4, Pick 116: Jalen Dennis, DT, Indiana
Why Dennis? Dennis, a high-motor DT ranked 110-130 by PFF, is attainable at 116. His 2024 stats (5.5 sacks, 32 tackles) are modest, but his run-stopping disruption stands out. Outworking Indiana’s D-line, he’s depth behind Zach Sieler after Calais Campbell’s departure.
Toughness Factor: Dennis’ relentless hustle—chasing plays sideline to sideline—makes him a coach’s favorite. He dives for ball carriers when others quit.

Round 4, Pick 135: Oronde Gadsden II, TE, Syracuse
Why Gadsden? Gadsden, ranked 130-150 by NFL Draft Buzz, is a physical TE2 behind Jonnu Smith. His 2024 stats (45 catches, 600 yards) were limited by Syracuse’s QB play, but his contested catches and blocking effort shine. Miami needs a red-zone threat, and Gadsden’s toughness fits.
Toughness Factor: Gadsden’s physicality in traffic and in-line blocking, plus his film-study habits, make him a grinder. His father’s Dolphins legacy adds motivation.

Round 5, Pick 150: Gabe Hall, EDGE, Baylor
Why Hall? Hall, ranked 140-160 by NFL Draft Buzz, provides edge depth behind Jaelan Phillips and Bradley Chubb. His 2024 stats (4 sacks, 28 tackles) are modest, but his edge-setting and QB-chasing effort stand out. Miami’s edge unit needs depth post-2024 injuries.
Toughness Factor: Hall’s non-stop motor disrupts plays, even without big stats. He outworked Baylor’s D-line, grinding for every snap.

Round 5, Pick 155: Jermiel Atkins, G, Kentucky
Why Atkins? Atkins, ranked 150-170 by PFF, is a physical guard for depth behind Banks. His 2024 stats (80.5 PFF pass-blocking grade) are solid, but his run-blocking tenacity shines. He outworked Kentucky’s linemen, adding guard depth post-Hunt.
Toughness Factor: Atkins’ aggressive blocking and play-finishing mentality make him a grinder who’d push teammates in practice.

Round 7, Pick 224: Carson Schwesinger, LB, UCLA
Why Schwesinger? Ranked 200-230 by NFL Draft Buzz, Schwesinger bolsters linebacker depth behind David Long Jr. His 2024 stats (104 tackles) show productivity, but his play-chasing effort defines him. His special-teams upside adds value.
Toughness Factor: Schwesinger’s relentless tackling and block-fighting make him a high-motor fit, outworking UCLA’s defense.

Round 7, Pick 231: Tory Taylor, P, Iowa
Why Taylor? Ranked 220-240 by PFF, Taylor upgrades Miami’s punting over Jake Bailey. His 2024 stats (46.3-yard average, 20 punts inside the 20) and mental toughness in harsh conditions stand out.
Toughness Factor: Taylor’s obsessive preparation and clutch punting in tough weather show a grinder’s mentality, rare for a punter.

Round 7, Pick 253: Ko’o Kia, DT, Fresno State
Why Kia? Ranked 240-260 by NFL Draft Buzz, Kia adds DT depth. His 2024 stats (3 sacks, 25 tackles) are modest, but his run-lane clogging stands out. He outworked Fresno State’s D-line, fighting for a roster spot.
Toughness Factor: Kia’s relentless motor makes him disruptive, aligning with your grinder preference.

Summary
This mock delivers the toughest players for Miami’s needs:
  • Immediate Starters: Banks (G) starts at guard, Watts (S) fills Holland’s role, and Barron (CB2) pairs with Ramsey.
  • Key Additions: Gadsden (TE2) and Dennis (DT) address needs with upside.
  • Depth: Hall (EDGE), Atkins (G), Schwesinger (LB), Taylor (P), and Kia (DT) add high-motor depth.All players are verified for availability (PFF, NFL Draft Buzz, The Athletic) and toughness, building a physical Dolphins roster for the AFC East. If you need tweaks (e.g., trades), let me know!
Good luck u might get first pick right.
 
Aside from this AI model being extremely flawed in regards to when players will actually be coming off the board, it managed to run a 7 round simulation of drafting the toughest players in the draft and somehow Miami came away without the toughest player in the ENTIRE draft: Cam Skatteboo.

I do love this idea however and I honestly think Miami would be pretty smart to run the next 4 or 5 drafts with the philosophy of drafting the toughest player available with every single pick.

I’m not having fun watching this team play football anymore and that’s been the case for some time now. I’d rather see them start drafting guys who might grade slightly lower athletically, but when you watch their film it quickly becomes apparent that these guys play the game of football as if they cannot live without it.

The only way to FINALLY purge this team of the soft ass mentality that we saw late last season in Green Bay- and for the last 3+ decades, is to systematically start drafting/signing guys that you damn near have to drag off the field. I can live with the results so long as at the end of the day we can actually say that we just watched a Dolphins team compete their asses off until the final whistle. It’s been a long time and a lot of coaches since we were able to say that…
 
Last edited:
Aside from this AI model being extremely flawed in regards to when players will actually be coming off the board, it managed to run a 7 round simulation of drafting the toughest players in the draft and somehow Miami came away without the toughest player in the ENTIRE draft: Cam Skatteboo.

I do love this idea however and I honestly think Miami would be pretty smart to run the next 4 or 5 drafts with the philosophy of drafting the toughest player available with every single pick.

I’m not having fun watching this team play football anymore and that’s been the case for some time now. I’d rather see them start drafting guys who might grade slightly lower athletically, but when you watch their film it quickly becomes apparent that these guys play the game of football as if they cannot live without it.

The only way to FINALLY purge this team of the soft ass mentality that we saw late last season in Green Bay- and for the last 3+ decades, is to systematically start drafting/signing guys that you damn near have to drag off the field. I can live with the results so long as at the end of the day we can actually say that we just watched a Dolphins team compete their asses off until the final whistle. It’s been a long time and a lot of coaches since we were able to say that…
Hear hear
 
Aside from this AI model being extremely flawed in regards to when players will actually be coming off the board, it managed to run a 7 round simulation of drafting the toughest players in the draft and somehow Miami came away without the toughest player in the ENTIRE draft: Cam Skatteboo.

I do love this idea however and I honestly think Miami would be pretty smart to run the next 4 or 5 drafts with the philosophy of drafting the toughest player available with every single pick.

I’m not having fun watching this team play football anymore and that’s been the case for some time now. I’d rather see them start drafting guys who might grade slightly lower athletically, but when you watch their film it quickly becomes apparent that these guys play the game of football as if they cannot live without it.

The only way to FINALLY purge this team of the soft ass mentality that we saw late last season in Green Bay- and for the last 3+ decades, is to systematically start drafting/signing guys that you damn near have to drag off the field. I can live with the results so long as at the end of the day we can actually say that we just watched a Dolphins team compete their asses off until the final whistle. It’s been a long time and a lot of coaches since we were able to say that…
Yep. That was the idea. Who are the players that are going to chew nails for this team that fit some of the spots we have open. That's how you get this back to a team that you believe in.
 
Back
Top Bottom