bdmagnum
Big Daddy
Celtkin said:You're right. I misread the post. For some reason I read Travis and saw Leonard.
I hate when that happens, see one thing, read another.:)
Celtkin said:You're right. I misread the post. For some reason I read Travis and saw Leonard.
NathanHunt said:According to the San Diego Chargers, you don't have to choose. You can have both. Situationally, what's the difference between Brees/Feeley and Rivers/Smith?
Change is the only constant in this league.
bdmagnum said:I hate when that happens, see one thing, read another.:)
Dolfan1000 said:Only one small difference- Brees made the Pro Bowl.
Dolfan1000 said:Only one small difference- Brees made the Pro Bowl.
bdmagnum said:More than one small difference. He had a running game and a better offensive line to name a few.
NathanHunt said:REALLY, he made the Pro Bowl BEFORE they drafted Rivers?
Amazing how facts blur in hindsight.
bdmagnum said:More than one small difference. He had a running game and a better offensive line to name a few.
Dolfan1000 said:I dont quite understand your point- you are comparing AJ now to Brees before this year? Why?
Dolfan1000 said:So you think if we invest a #2 in a QB, we go with Feeley anyway?
That would make zero sense in my opinion. Either rebuild or play to win. Choose.
NathanHunt said:According to the San Diego Chargers, you don't have to choose. You can have both. Situationally, what's the difference between Brees/Feeley and Rivers/Smith?
Change is the only constant in this league.
NathanHunt said:WHY?!
Let me refresh your memory:
You said we couldn't start "go" with Feeley IF we invest a #2 in a QB.
I said:
Do you even RECALL the public opinion in SD of Brees BEFORE the '04 draft?
He was HOMERED. No fan wanted him to start the next year..... does this RING a BELL?! FEELEY!
Drafting a QB @ #2 is like SD drafting a QB @ #1 in '04.
ARE YOU STARTING TO SEE THE SIMILARITY?
Do you get the point that you CAN draft a QB, not play him and STILL PLAY TO WIN with your current QB!
That was PAINFUL!
:0wned: