article on JT and surtain trades

[Puffboy(ricky)]

this site won't let me post the link for some reason but Seattle times under the Garcia article

 

[FinaticPatch]

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/ht...487_hawk09.html

 

[NYNCDOLFAN]

this site won't let me post the link for some reason but Seattle times under the Garcia article

Artilce says seattle might want JT instead because they have a void at DE but no serious talks have taken place...which means just another RUMOR

 

[godfater21]

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/seahawks/2002201487_hawk09.html

I already posted it under the Taylor for Edge thread

 

[DolphinDevil28]

There is no "JT trade."

 

[godfater21]

There is no "JT trade."

Yet. IF Saban wants to run a 3-4 with JT at OLB and he refuses than he is gone.

 

[BennyVW]

it costs us too much in cap room to let him go...he's more expensive if we trade him than keep him on the bench for a year...no trade on jt...sorry

 

[texasPHINSfan]

Yet. IF Saban wants to run a 3-4 with JT at OLB and he refuses than he is gone.

JT isn't going to "refuse"

he may pout, but he will eventually give in. he is paid to play for the team. where in the contract does it say "you play DE or you have the option to leave"?

JT is a true team player, and wants to play like one. my only understanding is his agent said that because maybe good linebackers get paid more? i don't know, but i imagine there is something fiscally behind it.