zed
Practice Squad
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2006
- Messages
- 42
- Reaction score
- 0
Seroius question after reading many of the debates that makes it seem that being a fan its very hard to get an objective debate comparing players.
The Taylor Rice poll was so lopsided I was even suprised even though I knew Taylor would win and think he is slightly better although I suspect the fan in me helps make that decision. I also saw the Bush- Brown poll and thought it might be a little closer but I guess we are also have the disadvantage and advantage of Ronnie playing already.
As a SF fan which I am not I think they could make every bit the case that Frank Gore is better than Ronnie Brown based on YPC and he had one less td and had only one less run of over 20 yards. This from a back that only started 1 game and was also impressive catching the ball. I don't really bring this up to cause a flame war, just wondering if any really believe they can be unbiased in cases where there is some debate, not areas like is Ronnie better than SHaun and I would bet that Ronnie would get some votes.
The Taylor Rice poll was so lopsided I was even suprised even though I knew Taylor would win and think he is slightly better although I suspect the fan in me helps make that decision. I also saw the Bush- Brown poll and thought it might be a little closer but I guess we are also have the disadvantage and advantage of Ronnie playing already.
As a SF fan which I am not I think they could make every bit the case that Frank Gore is better than Ronnie Brown based on YPC and he had one less td and had only one less run of over 20 yards. This from a back that only started 1 game and was also impressive catching the ball. I don't really bring this up to cause a flame war, just wondering if any really believe they can be unbiased in cases where there is some debate, not areas like is Ronnie better than SHaun and I would bet that Ronnie would get some votes.