Barry Jackson: Players beginning to question the coaches | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Barry Jackson: Players beginning to question the coaches

Casas9425

Club Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2006
Messages
5,719
Reaction score
3,557
Joe Philbin’s refusal to publicly name Ryan Tannehill his starting quarterback, which upset Tannehill and puzzled numerous players, wasn’t the only uncomfortable issue between the coaching staff and Dolphins players last week.
According to multiple sources, an emotional defensive coordinator Kevin Coyle let his players know, loud and clear, that he was upset that The Miami Herald reported Monday, quoting sources, that players were furious about aspects of Coyle’s strategy against Kansas City, including havingCameron Wake or Jason Trusnik cover speedy running back Joe McKnight on two passing plays that both resulted in touchdowns.
Several players thought that approach was ridiculous. But Coyle angrily told his players that he doesn’t want the media to know about any more of their complaints.
Meanwhile, some Dolphins players thought the coaches worked them too hard this past week and that the team should have departed for London earlier than Thursday evening so that players could get acclimated to the five-hour time difference.
What’s more, receiver Brian Hartline believed it was “silly” that Philbin characterized Hartline’s excessive celebration penalty against Kansas City as a poor reflection on Philbin. But Philbin was so peeved about the penalty that he brought it up in a team meeting on Tuesday, saying that can never happen again.
Players appreciate that Philbin told the team that he would have handled the Tannehill fiasco differently if he had to do it over again. But several privately blamed Philbin for making this a “distraction,” as Tannehill phrased it.
And finally, one Dolphins player complained that coaches have told him two completely conflicting things regarding technique, leaving him unsure what to do.
Let’s be clear: There are some very good coaches on this staff. But the past seven days weren’t good for Philbin, offensive coordinator Bill Lazor(who didn’t run the ball enough against Kansas City) or Coyle (who advocated the McKnight coverage debacle). And Philbin’s long-term future will look even more precarious if Miami loses Sunday.

Read more here: http://miamiherald.typepad.com/spor...-fins-heat-marlins-chatter.html#storylink=cpy
 
Right now this organization doesn't have great leadership being represented by the coaching staff and the distractions that we had last year are returning. They are not at the same magnitude right now, but this team can't afford another year of this.
 
i was a philbin supporter and wanted him when we were looking for a hc. but now after a collapse last year and this ridiculous crap im done. time to move on
 
Having hope and positivity for this organization currently is pretty damn difficult. Once the national media gets a hold of this stuff, a downward spiral is almost a certainty. Especially with players and coaches pitting themselves against each other and coaches not being on the same page.
 
Winning cures all and this team will be doing a bunch of winning in the later half of the season. None of this bull will matter come December.
 
Well, it looks like players really paid a lot of attention to Coyle's tirade and demands considering they immediately came back to the Miami Herald to divulge details of their private meeting, lol.
 
The coaches ability is in question on them doing there jobs and now they are taking it out on the players. This is not good for the organization. If Mr. Ross had the respect he should walk in the locker room and set things straight.
 
Trying to be positive but this raiders game is setting up for disappointment. I can only hope this past two weeks somehow gets forgotten and they snap out of it.
 
Man, I can't take much more of this, why can't we just get some good damn leadership? A guy that don't give a **** about celebrations, a guy that backs his team up, a guy that will lead us into battle with a good plan and make the right adjustments to win the battle. It really can't be that hard. It can't be.
 
The local media have their pitch forks out and Philbin is giving them plenty to rally the disgruntled fans with. Although I think some of this is embellished by the media, especially Armando who want a story of dissention because that sells, Philbin hasn't helped keep the focus on football.

It's whatever at this point. Just waiting to see how the season ends up. It's still too early to make any decisions about anything IMO. Once the season is over we'll see where we stand. I don't see a point in crying about every coach and player on the team every day/week right now but that's me.
 
Misery loves company. Some comfort here in knowing we're not alone in questioning our coaches and their handling of press conferences. :chase:

On Monday night, Colts offensive coordinator Pep Hamilton made a couple of questionable calls. Yesterday, his boss Chuck Pagano met with the media and took responsibility for play calls that everyone knows were Pep's. I was impressed with Chuck Pagano yesterday. He didn't throw anybody underneath the bus but at the same time didn't cover over mistakes or the fact that he needs to be better. Today, Pep met with the media, and while he tried to answer the soft ball criticisms lofted at him, I don't think he did so adequately. A lot of this might be nit-picking, but the underlying issues are certainly ones to consider.

Pep Hamilton was talking today about how he thought Trent Richardson and Ahmad Bradshaw ran well overall and how the team passed the ball well overall. But directly after saying those things about his players, he also said this: "But at the end of the day in this league, you guys all well know it always comes down to one, two, three or four plays that can make the difference in a game." In other words, Pep thought that his players played well overall but that just a few bad plays can be the difference.

Just a few minutes later, Pep Hamilton was asked about his coaching and how there are two big plays that fans are talking about (the pass on third down that was picked off and then the run on second down). Pep said that he was certainly disappointed that the Colts didn't win the game, but that: "I think it's a lot more to the end result of that game than two play calls." In other words, Pep didn't think he had a great game overall but doesn't think that just two "bad" play calls by him makes a big difference in the game. He has a point that there's much more to the end result than that, but contrasted with what he said just minutes earlier about the players and it sounds a bit like excuse making.

More here: http://www.stampedeblue.com/2014/9/...d-failed-to-adequately-answer-questions-about
 
Can't wait for this "story" to completely disappear after we beat Oakland and go into the bye week. The media and public has such little attention span that nobody will even remember this ****storm week.
 
Back
Top Bottom