Bleacher Report says we are cutting Mike Wallace | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Bleacher Report says we are cutting Mike Wallace

Elle Clouds

Elle Clouds

Active Roster
Joined
Feb 14, 2006
Messages
2,408
Reaction score
852
Try adding talent once in a while instead of replacing it. This would take the euphoria of the Kenny Stills trade away.
 
Ditch the Bitch.

Labor-Day-.jpg
 
if true i know people are gonna hate me for saying it but i called it after the stills trade...
 
We should keep Wallace IMO. Imagine having two of the faster guys in the NFL on both sides of the field at the same time, one of which has great hands...
 
We will need another WR to play opposite Stills. That is for sure. I saw someone suggest that they are going to want to use Jordan Cameron on the perimeter a lot... and I think there is some truth to that, but I can't imagine they're banking on that being a neat solution.

Ultimately it's about having a speedster to stretch the field, and one who is maybe a better fit for Ryan Tannehill. Kenny Stills is gonna make 600,000 dollars this year. Mike Wallace is going to make like 11 million dollars. Economic decisions.

Maybe Wallace to Philly???
 
Wallace doesn't have ANY trade value at this point? Not even a 5th or 6th? Is the contract that much of an albatross for a trade?
 
hooshoops said:
if true i know people are gonna hate me for saying it but i called it after the stills trade...
Click to expand...

Doubt you were only one with that thought. Actually I was talking with my dad and he said that and he doesn't watch football much so not much insight there lol.
 
hooshoops said:
if true i know people are gonna hate me for saying it but i called it after the stills trade...
Click to expand...

It's kinda obvious that he's Wallace's replacement. I'm assuming it's a huge cap savings that allows us to re-sign Clay and fill out the rest of the roster to go BPA in the draft.
 
SkapePhin said:
Wallace doesn't have ANY trade value at this point? Not even a 5th or 6th? Is the contract that much of an albatross for a trade?
Click to expand...

I think in order to trade Wallace, you'd have to:

1. Take another player with an inflated salary that a team wants off their books.
2. Throw in a draft pick.
 
Why wouldn't we, his cheaper younger more efficient replacement is already here.

Wallace is scum anyway.
 
Bruzer said:
Doubt you were only one with that thought. Actually I was talking with my dad and he said that and he doesn't watch football much so not much insight there lol.
Click to expand...

and the responses i expected
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom