What if he was 6’ 1.5” and 220 lbs?!
:nuke:
Tweener, judgment call.
What if he was 6’ 1.5” and 220 lbs?!
:nuke:
He is fast and explosive. I like that.
I do not like that he is 6-2, 215. He should be 6-1, 215, or 6-2, 225 with same explosiveness.
What if he was 6’ 1.5” and 220 lbs?!
:nuke:
Stills-Parker-Wilson-Grant are the top 4.
Ford,Louis,Butler and probably a draft pick will fight for the #5 spot.
He is fast and explosive. I like that.
I do not like that he is 6-2, 215. He should be 6-1, 215, or 6-2, 225 with same explosiveness.
A little OT, and I get the 'prototypical' angle, but does one inch or 10 lbs really make that much difference?
That's what she said....wait....what?Hahahaha what the **** is this? This is like a Michael Scott quote from the Office.
How did I know it was you, Largo, before I looked?Yes, standards draw the line somewhere.
Yes, standards draw the line somewhere.
I like to learn things as much as the next guy.
I went and checked out the top WR in the league for 2018.
I stopped after the first 45.
You know how many of the top 45 WR in the NFL last season were 6'2" and 225?
Zero.
http://www.fftoday.com/rankings/pla...eID=1&order_by=Rank&sort_order=ASC&cur_page=0
what is the range of 'prototypical?' 2 lbs, 5 lbs?
All of those receivers seem to be doing just fine without falling into your rigid standardsstandards