dolfan25
Club Member
I don't usually like typing my laughing but I gotta tell you guys about this one. I had an argument with a poster over on the BBI. This clown is convinced that in the all time rankings of RB's in NFL history that Thurman Thomas should be ranked higher than Jim Brown. He says Brown only played 9 years so that counts against him. What he doesn't seem to realize is that most great RB's have about 7 years of great production and that's it. Don't get me wrong I think Thurman was a nice back and 1 of the all time greats but better than Jim Brown. Please. What a joke.
Here's the link it's at the end where this D-Rocafella spouts off.
http://buffalorange.temppublish.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=19799
I know everyone has an opinion and a right to it but some things are so stupid you just can't believe it. This is equivalent to saying that Eddie Murray was a better home run hitter than Ruth.
Here's the link it's at the end where this D-Rocafella spouts off.
http://buffalorange.temppublish.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=19799
I know everyone has an opinion and a right to it but some things are so stupid you just can't believe it. This is equivalent to saying that Eddie Murray was a better home run hitter than Ruth.