Posted this before, but I think it directly relates to your post. Let me know what you think, particularly about scheme philosophy.
I understand what a lot of you are saying about getting a "stud" ILB, but that's easier said than done.
In this scheme, your "thumper" is not going to be a three down player unless he can also handle coverage responsibilities at a high level. Those players are rare, expensive, and for the most part unavailable. It doesn't make sense to pay a LB top tier $ if he has to come out every time a sub package comes in.
AVG and Philips are listed as LBers. That should tell you that we are not using a conventional LB alignment most of the time.
I get the impression many do not like the scheme, and want to bring in players that fit their preferred defensive philosophy. If that is the case, that's something that can be debated, but there's no upside to paying a square peg to come in and fill a round hole.