Check out this fact.... | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Check out this fact....

F

Fins05:NewHope

Long Time Veteran
Joined
Mar 5, 2005
Messages
1,110
Reaction score
0
Age
54
Location
Toledo, Ohio
Dolphins have thrown 69 more passes to Chris Chambers than to their No. 2 receiver, Marty Booker. That's the second-biggest difference between the top two receivers on the same team. The biggest difference, you probably have guessed, is in Carolina, between Steve Smith and an inanimate carbon rod. NEXT: at SD


Wow....well you know...maybe those drops we all blame him for are just Murphys Law....I mean nobody catches everything...and just about every team knows we are throwing to Chambers...which doesnt help either.
 
Interesting stat. When you think about it, we really can't rely on anyone else other than Chambers to make the important grabs. That became apparent when all they would do is throw to CC against Buffalo. But then again, Booker was out.
 
Fins05:NewHope said:
Dolphins have thrown 69 more passes to Chris Chambers than to their No. 2 receiver, Marty Booker. That's the second-biggest difference between the top two receivers on the same team. The biggest difference, you probably have guessed, is in Carolina, between Steve Smith and an inanimate carbon rod. NEXT: at SD


Wow....well you know...maybe those drops we all blame him for are just Murphys Law....I mean nobody catches everything...and just about every team knows we are throwing to Chambers...which doesnt help either.
Click to expand...



looking at that stat, you could say that, but steeve smith has dropped that much, but still it plays into affect, i think its a little bit of both....
 
Fins05:NewHope said:
The biggest difference, you probably have guessed, is in Carolina, between Steve Smith and an inanimate carbon rod.
Click to expand...

Hey that carbon rod is busy saving HOmer Simpson on the space shuttle.
 
One more reason Miami needs to seriously upgrade the WR position.
 
re:

I've always liked Marty Booker, even when he was a Bear. I wish they'd use him a tad more. I think he could be an adequate #2 WR, he'd be a fantastic #3 if we picked up someone else. *cough* T.O. *cough*
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom