Ryleigh97
Starter
Everyone has witnessed all of the coverage on Chris Long the past month, but I've noticed a parallel between C Long and Matt Roth at this time three years ago, but without the HOF pedigree and national coverage.
Similar size, 'high motor guy', good technique, went against top LT's in practice daily (R Gallery vs D Furgeson), blah, blah, blah.
I had high expectations for Roth. I guess maybe I was hoping for a young Trace Armstrong. Now that Chris Long is a distinct possibility at #1, I don't want to go through the same let down.
If he is as good as everyone makes him out to be, great, line him up opposite JT and let the carnage begin. Otherwise take the other Long.
Similar size, 'high motor guy', good technique, went against top LT's in practice daily (R Gallery vs D Furgeson), blah, blah, blah.
I had high expectations for Roth. I guess maybe I was hoping for a young Trace Armstrong. Now that Chris Long is a distinct possibility at #1, I don't want to go through the same let down.
If he is as good as everyone makes him out to be, great, line him up opposite JT and let the carnage begin. Otherwise take the other Long.