Chris Mort. | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Chris Mort.

kellyh3034

Scout Team
Joined
Sep 11, 2004
Messages
1,745
Reaction score
704
He was talking about teams that should be really worried and of course he said the Phins should be because teams have studied how to stop the wildcat of course like thats all the Phins have to worry about. He also said he thinks the Jets could win the division. Why is everything on ESPN centered around the Jets and New England? And Mike Greenberg, my god! I know hes a homer but his asking or redirecting every other question seemingly about the stinkin Jets is stupid.
 
After watching the NE/Buff game, anyone can win the division again. Pats D is a huge question.

As for his knock of the wildcat, if everyone is well prepared for it, why are other teams using it?
 
He was talking about teams that should be really worried and of course he said the Phins should be because teams have studied how to stop the wildcat of course like thats all the Phins have to worry about. He also said he thinks the Jets could win the division. Why is everything on ESPN centered around the Jets and New England? And Mike Greenberg, my god! I know hes a homer but his asking or redirecting every other question seemingly about the stinkin Jets is stupid.

As with any offensive formation, the key to success is execution. The Phins did not play well on offense.
If the O-line carries out their assignments the plays will be successful
 
How could ANYONE have a problem with Morts remark?? Based on Week 1 alone, how could you say we have anything besides the Wildcat? We should have ran the Wildcat and gimmickry every down! Everytime we tried a traditional formation Pennington got smothered, pressured, or intercepted! Until the Phins prove otherwise, the Wildcat IS all we have. Give me a ****ing break... You must be watching 2008, not 2009.
 
He was talking about teams that should be really worried and of course he said the Phins should be because teams have studied how to stop the wildcat of course like thats all the Phins have to worry about. He also said he thinks the Jets could win the division. Why is everything on ESPN centered around the Jets and New England? And Mike Greenberg, my god! I know hes a homer but his asking or redirecting every other question seemingly about the stinkin Jets is stupid.

If you rate the offensive lines based upon performance this week:

  1. Jets
  2. Patriots
  3. Bills
  4. Dolphins

If you rate the QBs based upon performance this week:

  1. Patriots
  2. Jets
  3. Bills
  4. Dolphins

If you rate the defenses based upon performance this week:

  1. Jets
  2. Dolphins
  3. Patriots
  4. Bills

Why are you surprised?
 
Honestly, I don't have a problem with that. 1 week of football doesn't mean anything, but that is our sample size so it's all we have. If you go by these last games clearly the best team would be the Jets followed by the Pats (mainly because they are the Pats) then Buffalo then us. The Jets played great D and their offense was Ok. Do I think it will stay in this order, of course not, but we clearly had the worst outing of the 4 teams.

As far as Mortensons comments on the Wildcat he is just playing to the crowd. It's just a formation that we use a few times a game not the whole offense. I think maybe the worst thing that happened to that formation was the ridiculous success it had against the Pats last year in the first game. When you saw the highlights you would think we used it the whole game or something because we scored 4 times out of the 6 plays. It didn't show that we were moving the ball pretty well in our base offense in that game already. If I remember correctly we had already scored out of the base offense before we even ran the first Wildcat play. But the perception generated from it's first success is that we run the thing all the time.
 
My point is that we shouldn't need it.

I agree with you. But at this point in time, we do. Based on last week's performance, we have a Mickey Mouse offense reminiscent of '07. Lets hope they come out this week not so pathetic.
 
He was talking about teams that should be really worried and of course he said the Phins should be because teams have studied how to stop the wildcat of course like thats all the Phins have to worry about. He also said he thinks the Jets could win the division. Why is everything on ESPN centered around the Jets and New England? And Mike Greenberg, my god! I know hes a homer but his asking or redirecting every other question seemingly about the stinkin Jets is stupid.
Because ESPN is based in the northeast. If you think about all the teams they talk about all the time and pay most attention to regardless of teams record it's Jets, Giants, Eagles, Steelers, Pats and only other team thats not in the northeast that they love to talk about would be the Cowboys. ESPN sucks and I don't respect their opinions.
 
I don't even watch ESPN anymore now that I get the NFL channel, but...

based on the preseason and that first game, the jests look like the class of our division right now. I hate to say that because I hate the jests.

That rookie QB has looked great so far and Ryan does not talk, look or act like a rookie head coach. Hiring Ryan was the best thing they've done since back when they hired Parcells.

Pennington may not necesarily be the problem, it could be the offensive play calling, but the offense looks WAY too focused on short routes and the wildcat IMO.

We only lost to the Falcons & they are in the NFC so it was really the perfect game to lose. Maybe the O-line will get better, maybe we will do a lot better against our division opponents since the team is really built to play against them. Let's see...
 
He was talking about teams that should be really worried and of course he said the Phins should be because teams have studied how to stop the wildcat of course like thats all the Phins have to worry about. He also said he thinks the Jets could win the division. Why is everything on ESPN centered around the Jets and New England? And Mike Greenberg, my god! I know hes a homer but his asking or redirecting every other question seemingly about the stinkin Jets is stupid.

Thats why I don;t listen to Chris Mortensen. We should be worried because teams have studied how to stop the wildcat? then why did we get a 5 yard gain out of it. How many times did we run the wildcat? the Media in general can not expect us to score with the wildcat every time we use it. that doesn't necessarily mean it's ineffective.

And of course he's going to say the Jets can win the division. It doesn;t take a genuis to realize they looked like the better team in week 1 out of the rest of the teams in the AFCE, but also look at who they were playing. You cannot tell who is going to be good after the first week. Look at Buffalo last year, everyone had them written in for winning the division after Brady went down and they went into complete meltdown mode.

Don;t listen to the idiots on ESPN.
 
Please, tell me 1 single thing you saw in last Sunday's game that makes you think we do NOT need the Wildcat?

The fact that Ricky Williams and Ronnie Brown combined for 78 yards on 16 attempts (4.9 yards per carry) out of non-Wildcat formations.

Here's an honest assessment of the offense's problems last week:

1. Turnovers. No excused. Anthony Fasano's two fumbles were the worst and more unacceptable.

2. Pressure. Jake Long had trouble with both John Abraham and Kroy Biermann. IMO, Abraham knew from all his experience with Pennington that he couldn't go speed on him because Chad would expect that and step up. Instead, he used the wide spacing and his reputation for speed, to bull rush Jake Long. He got in Jake's head a little bit, and that leaked over to Kroy Biermann's success as well. But the rest of the line were allowing pressure as well.

3. Pennington. He played like the panicky, conservative player he was in New York. Sometimes when there's pressure, you've got to step up and make a play.

4. Receivers. They weren't getting open quickly enough for Pennington to get the ball out.

5. Play calling. When you see a four man rush getting the better of your guys in pass pro, there are some things you can do to make them think more and soften their pass rush...I didn't notice many of those types of plays being called. Also, when you're facing a short secondary, you want to get bigger players matched against them in a number of roles, either receivers or running backs or tight ends. We didn't seem to do that.

I don't think the Wildcat solves any of these issues. The Wildcat doesn't get receivers open sooner. The Wildcat doesn't get Chad Pennington into a better rhythm, if anything it's the opposite. The Wildcat doesn't take the edge off a four man rush in a normal looking formation. The Wildcat is a more turnover-prone formation, not a lesser one.

Miami had issues, and now they will work to resolve them. That's the beginning, middle and end of the story on a 12 point road loss against a team that will probably win its division and compete for a Super Bowl bid.

If I trust any coaching staff to scare the bajesus out of a team that is turning the ball over too much, it's the coaching staff that damn near got them to a record low number of turnovers a year ago. Tony Sparano is already working on the spacing and technical issues that created problems in pass protection. IMO, he's got to overstep his former student Dave DeGuglielmo a little bit more in this area and my impression from watching Tony speak is he's about to do just that. Pennington knows how to bounce back from a tough performance. He certainly did exactly that in Week 3 after such an abysmal performance on the road against the Cardinals in Week 2. They can learn from their play calling mistakes. The only problem I see that might not be so easy to correct is getting the WRs open quicker and more consistently, but then if you have better pass protection and better QB play and more opportunistic game plans, that won't matter quite as much.
 
Back
Top Bottom