ckparrothead
Premium Member
I would imagine that they still have options should they see the right opportunity. Like with WRs, they have a couple they could cut. For instance if we had a hardon for Darnay Scott, we could cut Oronde to get him.
Originally posted by ckparrothead
For instance if we had a hardon for Darnay Scott, we could cut Oronde to get him.
thank you; and particularly when Ozzy is making the point that we have all heard over and over than Burnett will be the only signing for now.Originally posted by VanDolPhan
Oy guys don't make me go through all the common sense reasoning on why if any of the top 4 WR's were to be cut it would be OG again. I'm sure you guys are sick of hearing about that
your actually serious?Originally posted by ckparrothead
I would imagine that they still have options should they see the right opportunity. Like with WRs, they have a couple they could cut. For instance if we had a hardon for Darnay Scott, we could cut Oronde to get him.
Originally posted by chevysales
your actually serious?
while orande only has one or on the outside 2 seasons left in his toes/feet i hardly think cutting him is gonna get a ton of money to get a wide out that will fill the same role.
ain't gonna happen!
Originally posted by ckparrothead
I would imagine that they still have options should they see the right opportunity. Like with WRs, they have a couple they could cut. For instance if we had a hardon for Darnay Scott, we could cut Oronde to get him.
Originally posted by Gilly
OG is a big weapom to lose, DS coming off the leg thing is a risk I would stick with OG:monkey: