Decleater
Rookie
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2008
- Messages
- 151
- Reaction score
- 10
Hey. This is my first post on this forum, but as a long time Dolphin fan i felt compelled to give my humble opinion on a man i have enjoyed watching for 12 years. The man that made me stop staring at the QB position and instead focus every down on what the MLB was doing.
I can see reasons for Zack to go, his salary, his health, his age. But at this time in this franchise's situation i dont get it. Now if we had:
i) drafted a ILB last year that was ready to play (we didnt)
or
ii) had Crowder proven himself last year filling in (please)
or
iii) was sure to get a great ILB in the draft (?)
or
iv) there were good, young ILB available in FA (nope)
then i could understand it. But as it is our LB core is a shell, with only Porter as a proven LB who really just had an up and down year. Crowder, Pope, Spragan........ makes me want to watch soccer.
Now if we play a 4-3, Zack would make perfect sense to keep, we draft Dorsey, a 2nd day ILB and we have a decent defence for next year. Then his contract would expire and based off of his year and the potential of our drafted LB we decide wether or not to keep him.
If we play a 3-4, (which we really wont untill JT is gone, till then we just play a hybrid), then we address the NT/DE and take a 2nd day ILB hoping the year after he can replace Zach.
As for the cap hit, we are already 30mil+ under, although his contract should have been reduced, the Dolphins are still way under. If we were at 10mil, then its a different story.
This upcoming season it would be optimistic to hope for a 4-6 win season, and Zacks salary, health, and age arnt going to change that. But to see him retire a Dolphin is priceless. And what did we gain from cutting him, absolutely nothing.
Decleater
I can see reasons for Zack to go, his salary, his health, his age. But at this time in this franchise's situation i dont get it. Now if we had:
i) drafted a ILB last year that was ready to play (we didnt)
or
ii) had Crowder proven himself last year filling in (please)
or
iii) was sure to get a great ILB in the draft (?)
or
iv) there were good, young ILB available in FA (nope)
then i could understand it. But as it is our LB core is a shell, with only Porter as a proven LB who really just had an up and down year. Crowder, Pope, Spragan........ makes me want to watch soccer.
Now if we play a 4-3, Zack would make perfect sense to keep, we draft Dorsey, a 2nd day ILB and we have a decent defence for next year. Then his contract would expire and based off of his year and the potential of our drafted LB we decide wether or not to keep him.
If we play a 3-4, (which we really wont untill JT is gone, till then we just play a hybrid), then we address the NT/DE and take a 2nd day ILB hoping the year after he can replace Zach.
As for the cap hit, we are already 30mil+ under, although his contract should have been reduced, the Dolphins are still way under. If we were at 10mil, then its a different story.
This upcoming season it would be optimistic to hope for a 4-6 win season, and Zacks salary, health, and age arnt going to change that. But to see him retire a Dolphin is priceless. And what did we gain from cutting him, absolutely nothing.
Decleater