So far we've heard rumors about Vance Joseph running the "4-3 under" as well as the "wide 9". Whatever defense we run will likely be built around Ndamukong Suh. He had great success in Detroit but 90% of the time he played left/strong side DT. He lined up mostly in the B gap between the right guard and right tackle or in the A gap between the center and right guard as a 1 technique depending on the call.
We have the same coaches here from Detroit that ran the wide 9 in Detroit. Typically Suh was lined up as a 1 or 2i tech and not always in the 3 technique role. He also would occasionally line up as a 6 tech and stunt back into the opposite b-gap. This surprised me as I always thought of him as the prototype 3-technique.
He was still pretty good in the same (strong/left side) role in Miami but deficiencies in coaching as well as players next to him were not good enough to make the line better. Every time I noticed him last year he was on the left side of the defense next to Wake or Shelby.
Now if we run the 4-3 under, where does he go? Will he move to the right side as a true 3 technique? I can't imagine they will have him two-gapping at 1 or 5 tech. Wouldn't that be a waste of his best tools? In OTA's he was reported to be on the left side once again. It would seems to me that if we run a true "under" defense, the 3 tech is the most logical spot for him but then we don't have a guy to play 5 tech unless Jordan Phillips plays that role. Then we have ? at the 1 tech? Both (1 & 5) are two-gappers.
This also puts either Williams or Wake as the Sam which doesn't make sense either way since it doesn't really utilize their talents. Neither one should be playing 5 tech either. Wake is the best option at Leo as he can just get after the passer or disrupt the backfield. Williams will be not be happy if you try to put him at Sam or the 5 and make him two gap.
I'm getting the feeling that when an article quoted Tannenbaum as saying we will run the "4-3 under", it was misquoted from saying we will run the "4-3" UNDER Vance Joseph. ????
It seems to me based on personnel, that we would run a combination from the 4-3 over and wide 9.
I think running the 4-3 under puts more pressure on the personnel we have at DT. More of them would have to step up in order to run this scheme. Suh can play 3 or 1. Phillips could potentially play 5 or 1 but Chris Jones would have to step into either the 3, 5 or 1. That's counting on two players to step up. The "over" or "wide 9" only requires one player (besides Suh) to step up.
Wake and Williams out wide with Phillips at 2i and Suh at 3 tech. Occasionally switching it up with Jones/ Mitchell.
I think Jordan is a fit in the 4-3 under as the Sam but we have too many other personnel "mis-fits" in this system. otherwise I think we just put all our DE's (Jordan Included) out wide and get after it. This could really help out Jordan especially.
I'm just trying to piece this together ... what do you people think?
We have the same coaches here from Detroit that ran the wide 9 in Detroit. Typically Suh was lined up as a 1 or 2i tech and not always in the 3 technique role. He also would occasionally line up as a 6 tech and stunt back into the opposite b-gap. This surprised me as I always thought of him as the prototype 3-technique.
He was still pretty good in the same (strong/left side) role in Miami but deficiencies in coaching as well as players next to him were not good enough to make the line better. Every time I noticed him last year he was on the left side of the defense next to Wake or Shelby.
Now if we run the 4-3 under, where does he go? Will he move to the right side as a true 3 technique? I can't imagine they will have him two-gapping at 1 or 5 tech. Wouldn't that be a waste of his best tools? In OTA's he was reported to be on the left side once again. It would seems to me that if we run a true "under" defense, the 3 tech is the most logical spot for him but then we don't have a guy to play 5 tech unless Jordan Phillips plays that role. Then we have ? at the 1 tech? Both (1 & 5) are two-gappers.
This also puts either Williams or Wake as the Sam which doesn't make sense either way since it doesn't really utilize their talents. Neither one should be playing 5 tech either. Wake is the best option at Leo as he can just get after the passer or disrupt the backfield. Williams will be not be happy if you try to put him at Sam or the 5 and make him two gap.
I'm getting the feeling that when an article quoted Tannenbaum as saying we will run the "4-3 under", it was misquoted from saying we will run the "4-3" UNDER Vance Joseph. ????
It seems to me based on personnel, that we would run a combination from the 4-3 over and wide 9.
I think running the 4-3 under puts more pressure on the personnel we have at DT. More of them would have to step up in order to run this scheme. Suh can play 3 or 1. Phillips could potentially play 5 or 1 but Chris Jones would have to step into either the 3, 5 or 1. That's counting on two players to step up. The "over" or "wide 9" only requires one player (besides Suh) to step up.
Wake and Williams out wide with Phillips at 2i and Suh at 3 tech. Occasionally switching it up with Jones/ Mitchell.
I think Jordan is a fit in the 4-3 under as the Sam but we have too many other personnel "mis-fits" in this system. otherwise I think we just put all our DE's (Jordan Included) out wide and get after it. This could really help out Jordan especially.
I'm just trying to piece this together ... what do you people think?