Did not see this anywhere.
This is a great article, and even though he does not ever answer his own question, he does make a great point why he should be considered.
http://is.gd/q4zTSG
I have been saying from the beginning that before Zach retired, he was holding his own very well next to a guy like Ray Lewis. Ray may have averaged a bit better in sacks and ints per seasons, but Zach averaged better in tackles and forcing fumbles. Even if Ray Lewis is a no brainer, Zach does need to be a true consideration to be as good as he was compared to the other top players at his psoition.
This is a great article, and even though he does not ever answer his own question, he does make a great point why he should be considered.
Does former Miami Dolphins middle linebacker Zach Thomas belong in the NFL Hall of Fame? If you were to ask most Miami Dolphins fans the answer is yes, most certainly YES! Unfortunately for you and me and the rest of us that make up Dolphins Nation, we do not get to vote on who gets in and who does not. My mind set is that if a guy is a shoe in for your ring of honor then he should at least get strong national consideration for the HOF.
Zach's long time defensive teammate, best friend and brother in law, former Dolphins defensive end and linebacker Jason Taylor is a shoe in or at least that's the common belief among Dolphins fans. Luckily for us most of the national media seems to agree with Dolphins Nation. Most national media members, when asked agree that he has put together a HOF resume' based solely on his stats with special emphasis on his 139.5 career sacks placing him 6[SUP]th[/SUP] all time.
With that in mind I decided to take a look at some of his contemporaries and compare their stats to what Zack did in his career. By contemporaries I mean other middle linebackers that played more or less at the same time as Zach Thomas and also at a very high level. Below you will see the comparisons. Given that a couple of the others on this list are shoe-ins for the NFL Hall Of Fame what do you think are Zachs chances and do you think he deserves to be inducted with all the other greatest players to ever play the game?
YRS=years played; SK=sacks; INT=interceptions; TD's=touchdowns; PD=passes defended; FF=forced fumbles; FR=fumble recoveries; TKL=tackles; AV=yearly average for each year played
YRS SK/AV INT/AV TD's/AV PD/AV FF/AV FR/AV TD's/AV TKL/AV Zach Thomas 13 20.5/1.58 17/1.31 4/0.31 38/2.92 16/1.23 8/0.62 0/0 1727/132.85 Ray Lewis 17 41.5/2.44 31/1.82 3/0.18 81/4.76 19/1.12 20/1.18 0/0 2055/120.88 Junior Seau 20 56.5/2.82 18/0.9 0/0 23/1.15 11/0.55 18/0.9 1/0.05 1846/92.3 Brian Urlacher 13 41.5/3.19 22/1.69 2/0.15 85/6.54 11/0.85 15/1.15 2/0.15 1354/104.15 James Farrior 15 35.5/2.37 11/0.73 1/0.07 61/4.07 18/1.20 12/0.8 0/0 1412/94.13 London Fletcher 16 39/2.44 23/1.44 2/0.125 87/5.44 19/1.19 12/0.75 1/0.06 2031/126.93 Tedy Bruschi 13 30.5/2.35 12/0.92 4/0.31 44/3.38 17/1.31 7/0.54 0/0 1063/81.76
http://is.gd/q4zTSG
I have been saying from the beginning that before Zach retired, he was holding his own very well next to a guy like Ray Lewis. Ray may have averaged a bit better in sacks and ints per seasons, but Zach averaged better in tackles and forcing fumbles. Even if Ray Lewis is a no brainer, Zach does need to be a true consideration to be as good as he was compared to the other top players at his psoition.